Thread Closed

Iraqi WMDs... now in Syria?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Apr6-03, 05:57 PM   #1
 

Iraqi WMDs... now in Syria?


Several politicians, among them Sen. Warner (R-VA), the chair of the Armed Services Committee, have been saying today on CNN/MSNBC that they are sure Iraq has moved all its WMDs into Syria.

Now I am wondering if this is possibly true, or whether it's preparation for not finding any WMDs at all in Iraq -- which would be very embarrassing, to say the least, for this administration.

Also, has anyone heard confirmation or retraction of the claims of chem weapons found in the Euphrates? The story seems to have (surprise!) disappeared completely.
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Front-row seats to climate change
>> Attacking MRSA with metals from antibacterial clays
>> New formula invented for microscope viewing, substitutes for federally controlled drug
Apr6-03, 06:15 PM   #2
 
Originally posted by damgo
Several politicians, among them Sen. Warner (R-VA), the chair of the Armed Services Committee, have been saying today on CNN/MSNBC that they are sure Iraq has moved all its WMDs into Syria.

Now I am wondering if this is possibly true, or whether it's preparation for not finding any WMDs at all in Iraq -- which would be very embarrassing, to say the least, for this administration.

Also, has anyone heard confirmation or retraction of the claims of chem weapons found in the Euphrates? The story seems to have (surprise!) disappeared completely.
Surprise, surprise....they want to attack Syria, they transfer their suspiscions there. After that, I wonder if teh WMD will teleport to Iran?
 
Apr6-03, 06:20 PM   #3
 
I'm just reading on the latest news that
''troops in Karbala believe they have found chemical weapons in a drum rigged with explosives at a bridge''
and
''The US army says it has found evidence in an Iraqi training facility of what it belives are chemical weapons, including VX''
and that both discoveries are undergoing further investigation.

so I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss that they will not find any WMDs in Iraq. There are a lot of places still to look.
 
Apr6-03, 06:44 PM   #4
 

Iraqi WMDs... now in Syria?


^^^ Where are you seeing that? It's not shown up on any of my sources yet.

Remember the 'chemical weapons plant' in Najaf that turned out to be bunk, and the 'suspicious white powder' that turned out to be explosives, and... I could go on, but some media outlets seem to be eager to keep immediately reporting WMD finds that later turn out to be bunk. I trust unconfirmed chem weapon finds now about as much as I trust the wacky Iraqi info minister when he claims the destruction of dozens of American tanks.
 
Apr6-03, 09:00 PM   #5
 
Originally posted by Mulder
I'm just reading on the latest news that
''troops in Karbala believe they have found chemical weapons in a drum rigged with explosives at a bridge''
and
''The US army says it has found evidence in an Iraqi training facility of what it belives are chemical weapons, including VX''
and that both discoveries are undergoing further investigation.

so I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss that they will not find any WMDs in Iraq. There are a lot of places still to look.
Report on the front page, the inevitable retraction....page 17?
 
Apr7-03, 12:42 AM   #6
 
Mentor
Originally posted by Zero
Report on the front page, the inevitable retraction....page 17?
A little hasty I think, Zero. They are saying several soldiers have been sickened and tested positive for sarin exposure and they have pictures of the drums. We clearly need to see how the analysis of the drums plays out, but this at first glance appears to be the "smoking gun" Bush was looking for.
 
Apr7-03, 01:03 AM   #7
 
Originally posted by russ_watters
A little hasty I think, Zero. They are saying several soldiers have been sickened and tested positive for sarin exposure and they have pictures of the drums. We clearly need to see how the analysis of the drums plays out, but this at first glance appears to be the "smoking gun" Bush was looking for.
Well, there have been plenty of false alarms.
 
Apr7-03, 02:09 AM   #8
 
AARRRGGGHH!!!

Even I got taken by that bloody sarin story. But, then, again:
Coalition forces were briefly on alert Sunday for a suspected chemical-weapon attack, after U.S. soldiers evacuated an Iraqi military compound, after tests by a mobile laboratory of a substance in an oil drum showed evidence of sarin nerve gas. More than a dozen soldiers of the Army’s 101st Airborne Division had been sent earlier for chemical weapons decontamination after they exhibited symptoms of possible exposure to nerve agents. But U.S. military officials said later that what was in the drum was actually pesticide. NBC News’ Jim Miklaszewski reported that a later test confirmed that the contents were not sarin.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/870749.asp?vts=040620031900

Okay, what I want to know is how hard it can be to identify freakin sarin or mustard gas?! How many of these stories are we going to have to go through before the media realizes it oughtta shut the **** up until it can confirm? It's getting a tad old....
 
Apr7-03, 05:10 AM   #9
 
I don't see any further information about the two incidents of possible chemical weapons yesterday, so they appear to have been cleared as non-chemical. However, I repeat once again, there are a lot of sites marked out as possible WMD locations still to be searched.

It is quite possible that some WMDs have been moved to Syria - they have another terrorist supporting government. Some of you would refuse to believe that if VX was found in the middle of Damascus though.
 
Apr7-03, 05:21 AM   #10
 
Some of you would refuse to believe that if VX was found in the middle of Damascus though.
<looks innocent> Now who would those people be?

Seriously, I do find it interesting that Congress is now covering it's *** in case none are found. I had always assumed Iraq had a few WMDs left... but now I'm not so sure.
 
Apr7-03, 10:34 AM   #11
 
Originally posted by Mulder
I don't see any further information about the two incidents of possible chemical weapons yesterday, so they appear to have been cleared as non-chemical. However, I repeat once again, there are a lot of sites marked out as possible WMD locations still to be searched.

It is quite possible that some WMDs have been moved to Syria - they have another terrorist supporting government. Some of you would refuse to believe that if VX was found in the middle of Damascus though.
It is quite possibe that Iraq is hiding their weapons anywhere that we would like to invade anyways, huh? Nice logic, and it continues to put off the need to find proof, doesn't it?
 
Apr7-03, 11:01 AM   #12
 
I suppose that when the military reports that WMDs have been found, many will dismiss the claims as lies by the 'Evil One' George Bush.
 
Apr7-03, 11:30 AM   #13
 
Almost better than finding WMDs was killing Chemical Ali.

Horray for the Brits![:))]
 
Apr7-03, 12:12 PM   #14
 
Mentor
Originally posted by Mulder
I don't see any further information about the two incidents of possible chemical weapons yesterday, so they appear to have been cleared as non-chemical.
It takes a little while to test the sites. Remember also there is very little media around to document all of this. Whenever something is found by a unit it is reported by their single imbedded reporter and all other news outlets get the information from them. Obviously all of these reports are unconfirmed and will take some time (maybe weeks) to sort out.

Here is a story on the chemical agents ricin and botulinum, apparently found in northern Iraq.

Here is a story on three separate chemical finds, including the one with 12 barrels of what appears to be sarin. The pics aren't on that link, but I saw them on tv.

It really seems like you guys WANT to believe there are no chemical weapons in Iraq just so you can see the egg on the face of the US. With evidence mounting, I am wondering how long you guys will keep avoiding the inevitable conclusion. Conspiracy theory anyone?
 
Apr7-03, 01:05 PM   #15
 
Chemical Ali is one death in this war I won't shed too many tears over.

Like I said, I had always thought Saddam had a few chems left... but this recent maneuvering by Congress and the spate of "now you see it, now you don't" chem reports has me doubting. While I would love to see Bush get caught looking like a moron (he gets away with it too often), it's not particularly important for how I judge Iraq's WMDs or lack thereof. I'll believe it as soon as I reports that are more confirmed than "military sources say they might have found some." For example, when (if?) CENTCOM comes out and announces it.

More interesting I think is why Saddam didn't use his WMDs, if he has them? With 3ID in his main palace now, it's not like he's got a whole lot to use. If he indeed chose not to use them -- for international opinion or other reasons -- should we have been afraid he would at any other point, when his back wasn't to the proverbial wall?
 
Apr7-03, 01:15 PM   #16
 
Mentor
Originally posted by damgo
I'll believe it as soon as I reports that are more confirmed than "military sources say they might have found some." For example, when (if?) CENTCOM comes out and announces it.
Fog of war, damgo. Like I said, these are all unconfirmed and certainly the media has jumped the gun on several, but we're starting to see some reports that appear legit. Regardless, wait a few weeks for confirmations.

More interesting I think is why Saddam didn't use his WMDs, if he has them? With 3ID in his main palace now, it's not like he's got a whole lot to use. If he indeed chose not to use them -- for international opinion or other reasons -- should we have been afraid he would at any other point, when his back wasn't to the proverbial wall?
Yeah, very interesting question. I have a theory. Wanna hear it? TOUGH, here it is:

Saddam is dead and his lieutenants (generals) aren't anywhere near as crazy or stupid as he is. Rumor has it they have been authorized to use the WMD - but I think for their own sake they are chosing not to.
 
Apr7-03, 01:18 PM   #17
 
That fact that he (may)possess them and the fact that he is a rather evil dude adds up to a threat that shouldn't be ignored. Who knows, maybe his dog will bite the dust in the next fire fight and that will send Saddam over the edge.
 
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Iraqi WMDs... now in Syria?
Thread Forum Replies
[Not so] Secret understandings reached between representatives of Israel, Syria Current Events 8
Who's next: Syria or Iran ? Current Events 14
Has the search for WMDs officially ended? Current Events 15
If Bush knowingly lied about WMDs, should he go to jail? Current Events 82
Iraqi's Flood back into Iraq from Syria? Current Events 1