Is the Potential in Quantum Hamiltonian II Always Real?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of the potential V in a Hamiltonian expressed as H=T+V, specifically questioning whether the potential must be real if the energies E_n and E_k are related as E*_n=E_k. The proof presented demonstrates that the expected value of the kinetic term T remains real, leading to the conclusion that the complex part b(x) of the potential must equal zero, thereby confirming that V is real. This implies that all eigenfunctions associated with the Hamiltonian are also real, reinforcing the hermitian nature of the Hamiltonian operator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics principles, particularly Hamiltonians
  • Familiarity with Hermitian operators and their properties
  • Knowledge of Eigenfunctions and Eigenvalues in quantum systems
  • Basic concepts of complex functions and integrals in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the role of potential energy in quantum systems
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of normalized Eigenfunctions
  • Learn about the significance of observables and their operators in quantum theory
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers focusing on quantum mechanics and Hamiltonian systems will benefit from this discussion.

eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
Let be a Hamiltonian in the form H=T+V we don,t know if V is real or complex..all we know is that if E_n is an energy also E*_n=E_k will be another energy, my question is if this would imply V is real...

my proof is taking normalized Eigenfunctions we would have that:

[tex](<\phi_{n}|H|\phi_{n}>)*=<\phi_{k}|H|\phi_{k}>[/tex]

so the expected value of T is always real,then we would have the identity with the complex part b(x) of the potential:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx(|\phi_{n}|^{2}+|\phi_{k}|^{2})b(x)=0[/tex]

for every k,and n so necessarily b=0 so the potential is real and all the eigenfunctions would be real.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I find the question a bit weird. The energy of a system is an observable and its corresponding operator is the Hamiltonian and is thus hermitian which implies having real eigenvalues. If you take V nonreal H isn't Hermitian anymore.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
756
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K