The missile and aircraft the saga goes on

  • Thread starter Thread starter ozzy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aircraft Missile
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the motion of a missile and an aircraft. The aircraft flies at a constant height and velocity, while the missile is fired directly at the aircraft with a greater velocity. Participants are exploring the time it takes for the missile to reach the aircraft without using integrals in their solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the relative velocities of the missile and aircraft in different coordinate systems. There are attempts to derive equations relating to the motion of both objects, with some questioning the validity of using integrals in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the assumptions made about the coordinate systems and the velocities involved. Some participants have offered insights into the nature of the missile's motion relative to the aircraft, while others are seeking clarification on specific points of confusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of their assumptions, particularly concerning the vertical motion of the aircraft in the missile's coordinate system. There are references to potential misunderstandings about the components of velocity and distance traveled in different frames of reference.

ozzy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Well, I am sorry to bother you again, but it seems that after solving my last problem nobody enters that topic anymore :rolleyes: I hope I won't get on moderators nerves here...
Well, anyway. As one may remember, I asked about this question:

an aircraft flights at height H with a constant velocity U.
When it passes right above the missile, the missile is fired with a constant velocity V (V>U), but the vector of the velocity of the missile points directly to the aircraft all the time of the flight of the missile.
The question is - what is the time of the total flight of the missile, till it gets the aircraft?
The solution should be done without any integrals.

The solution was made by balakrishnan_v, and did I mentioned that he is THE KING? :wink:
But since then I was thinking about the solution and here what I discovered:


the relative velocity between the missile and the plane in Cartesian axis is:
Vx(t) = V*cos{f(t)} - U
Vy(t) = V*sin{f(t)} - 0
and initial position,that should preserve is R = (0 , H)
therefore:
[tex]\int_{0}^{T} (Vcos{f(t)} - U)dt = 0[/tex]
and [tex]\int_{0}^{T} (Vsin{f(t)})dt = H[/tex]
therefore [tex]\int_{0}^{T} (sin{f(t)})dt = H/V[/tex] - which is turns to be right, as checked it in MATLAB.

Though, in the axis system of the missile we get:
the relative velocity between the missile and the plane in missile axis is:
Vs(t) = V - U*cos{f(t)}
Vp(t) = 0 - (-U*sin{f(t)})
and initial position,that should preserve is R = (H , 0)
therefore:
[tex]\int_{0}^{T} (V - Ucos{f(t)})dt = H[/tex]
and [tex]\int_{0}^{T} (Usin{f(t)})dt = 0[/tex]
therefore [tex]\int_{0}^{T} (sin{f(t)})dt = 0[/tex] - Where Am I Wrong? Please help! :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
since you are using an integral surely you are failling to answers the question.

isnt the answer is a classical curve that be done without calculus?
 
The answer for the original question is found here:

balakrishnan_v said:
Consider any instant at which the missile is making an angle A(t) with the horizontal
Consider along the direction in which the plane is moving
We have the relative velocity=
V-Ucos(A)
this is the rel vel along the line joining
missile and plane
so we have [tex]\int_{0}^{T} (V - Ucos{A(t)})dt = d[/tex]
or [tex]VT-U\int_{0}^{T} (cos{A(t)})dt = d[/tex]..(1)
and the other equation is that the horizontal distance moved by the plane and missile are same
so we have [tex]\int_{0}^{T} (Vcos{A(t)})dt = UT[/tex]
or [tex]\int_{0}^{T} (cos{A(t)})dt = \frac{UT}{V}[/tex]
substituting this in (1) we have
[tex]VT-U(UT/V)=d[/tex]
or [tex]T=\frac{HV}{(V^2-U^2)}[/tex]

But please help me with the current, new question, which is MY question, and not from the book...
 
ozzy said:
[tex]\int_{0}^{T} (Usin{f(t)})dt = 0[/tex]
therefore [tex]\int_{0}^{T} (sin{f(t)})dt = 0[/tex] - Where Am I Wrong? Please help! :frown:

If you consider the positive x-axis for the reference system of the missile as pointing in the direction of V and the y-axis as being perpendicular to it, you can see that the plane always lies on the positive x-axis as seen from the missile. Although at each instant it has a velocity component in the y-direction of -U*sin(theta), where theta is the angle the missile's velocity makes with the horizontal, the missile simply turns to keep the plane on its positive x-axis, thereby keeping the plane's velocity component in the y-direction of the missile's coordinate system effectively zero.

In short, the rotation rate of the missile's coordinate system cancels out the -U*sin(theta) component of the plane's velocity in that coordinate system.
 
Brinx said:
If you consider the positive x-axis for the reference system of the missile as pointing in the direction of V and the y-axis as being perpendicular to it, you can see that the plane always lies on the positive x-axis as seen from the missile. Although at each instant it has a velocity component in the y-direction of -U*sin(theta), where theta is the angle the missile's velocity makes with the horizontal, the missile simply turns to keep the plane on its positive x-axis, thereby keeping the plane's velocity component in the y-direction of the missile's coordinate system effectively zero.

In short, the rotation rate of the missile's coordinate system cancels out the -U*sin(theta) component of the plane's velocity in that coordinate system.

Yes, I also have this intuition, and regarding what you say, the last integral, with zero outcome is the right one, since the plane in missile system doesn't travel over Y axis. But since the second integral is the right one, and not fourth, it seems that the plane travels over distance [tex]\frac{HU}{V}[/tex] in Y missile direction...
how can you explain it?

Or actually what you try to say is that there is no velocity component in Y direction of the plane in missile system? But how it can be? Then the initial speed (not velocity) of the plane in missile system is zero?
I don't get...Maybe this is the reason why I am not a mechanist, but an electronicker:)
 
Last edited:
gnpatterson said:
yes and no...
yes in terms of expanding the problem to something universal...
no in terms that I still can't understand how it is possible that the second integral is not zero, but the fourth suppose to be a zero...
I understand that there is some problem with the assumptions...I just don't get what is the problem to assume, that in missile system the plane travels overall zero distance in vertical axis...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K