Problem : Metrics and Induced Topologies

  • Thread starter Thread starter AKG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induced
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the metrics \(d_p\) for \(p \in \{1, 2, 3, \ldots\}\) induce the same topology as the Euclidean metric \(d\) defined by \(d(x, y) = \left [\sum _{i = 1} ^n |x_i - y_i|^2\right ]^{1/2}\). The proof involves demonstrating that for any \(\epsilon > 0\) and \(x \in \mathbb{R}^n\), there exist \(\delta_1, \delta_2 > 0\) such that the inequalities \(d(x, y) < \delta_1\) implies \(d_p(x, y) < \epsilon\) and vice versa hold true. The discussion also raises questions about the use of induction on \(n\) or \(p\) and the necessity of visual aids in understanding the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and topology
  • Familiarity with the definitions of the Euclidean metric and \(d_p\) metrics
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical induction
  • Concept of convergence in metric spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of metric spaces and their topologies
  • Learn about the concept of convergence in different metrics
  • Explore proofs involving induction in mathematical analysis
  • Investigate the relationship between different metrics and their induced topologies
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of advanced calculus, and anyone studying topology and metric spaces will benefit from this discussion.

AKG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
2,561
Reaction score
4
The Euclidean metric, d, is defined by:

[tex]d(x, y) = \left [\sum _{i = 1} ^n |x_i - y_i|^2\right ]^{1/2}[/tex]

Define metrics dp for each p in {1, 2, 3, ...} as follows:

[tex]d_p(x,y) = \left [\sum _{i = 1} ^n |x_i - y_i|^p\right ]^{1/p}[/tex]

Prove that each dp induces the same topology as the Euclidean metric.

To do this, I want to show that for every [itex]\epsilon > 0[/itex] and for every [itex]x \in \mathbb{R}^n[/itex], there is are [itex]\delta _1,\, \delta _2 > 0[/itex] such that for every [itex]y \in \mathbb{R}^n[/itex]:

[tex]\left [\sum _{i = 1} ^n |x_i - y_i|^2\right ]^{1/2} < \delta _1 \Rightarrow \left [\sum _{i = 1} ^n |x_i - y_i|^p\right ]^{1/p} < \epsilon[/tex]

and

[tex]\left [\sum _{i = 1} ^n |x_i - y_i|^p\right ]^{1/p} < \delta _2 \Rightarrow \left [\sum _{i = 1} ^n |x_i - y_i|^2\right ]^{1/2} < \epsilon[/tex]

Is this the right way to prove it? Where do I go from here? Induction on n, or p? Or maybe both? Or is there a way to do it without induction? Help would be very much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, the problem I really have to solve is to show that, assuming each dp is a metric, they all induce the usual topology on Rn, and I figured the best way to do this was to show that they induced the same topology as the Euclidean metric since these "metrics" (they might not all be metrics, but the problem says to assume they are) look a lot like the Euclidean metric.
 
Well, when you don't understand something, draw a picture. :smile:

A circle (or an n-sphere, in general) is a characteristic of the Euclidean metric, right? What about these other metrics?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
903
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K