Finite Dimensional Representation of SU(2)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The irreducible representations of SU(2) defined by the action [U_j(g) f](v) = f(g^{-1} v) are confirmed to be unitary. Specifically, for the complex vector space V_2 of homogeneous polynomials of degree 2, the representation corresponds to the transformation of symmetric matrices A under group actions. The inner product is established through the trace operation, which remains invariant under the group action, confirming the unitarity of the representation. For higher values of j, the isomorphism with symmetric tensors and generalized traces applies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SU(2) group theory
  • Familiarity with homogeneous polynomials and their properties
  • Knowledge of complex vector spaces and matrix representations
  • Proficiency in linear algebra, specifically trace and inner product concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of unitary representations in Lie groups
  • Explore the relationship between symmetric matrices and polynomial representations
  • Learn about symmetric tensors and their applications in representation theory
  • Investigate the role of trace in inner product spaces and its implications in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students specializing in representation theory, quantum mechanics, and linear algebra who seek to deepen their understanding of SU(2) and its applications in various fields.

kakarukeys
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
Does anybody know whether the following irreducible representations of SU(2) are unitary?

g belongs to SU(2)
[tex][U_j(g) f](v) = f(g^{-1} v)[/tex]

f is an order-2j homogeneous complex polynomial of two complex variables v = (x, y)

e.g. for [tex]j = 1[/tex], [tex]f = 2x^2 + 3xy + 4y^2[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kakarukeys said:
Does anybody know whether the following irreducible representations of SU(2) are unitary?
g belongs to SU(2)
[tex][U_j(g) f](v) = f(g^{-1} v)[/tex]
f is an order-2j homogeneous complex polynomial of two complex variables v = (x, y)
e.g. for [tex]j = 1[/tex], [tex]f = 2x^2 + 3xy + 4y^2[/tex]
Hi, they are. For example: let's look at the complex vector space V_2 of polynomials which are homogeneous of degree 2. This vectorspace is isomorphic to the vectorspace of 2 times 2 complex symmetric matrices through f <- -> A, f(v) = v^T A v. The action of the group corresponds then to A --> \bar{g} A g* where v^T is the transpose, g* g = 1 and \bar{g} is the complex conjugate of the matrix g. The scalar product on this space is < A,B> = tr(A*B) where tr is trace. Under the action of g, this becomes:
<U(g)A, U(g)B> = tr(g A* g^T \bar{g} B g* ) = tr(A*g^T \bar{g} B) = tr(A*B)
For higher j you can use the isomorphism with the symmetric tensors and generalized traces.

Cheers,

Careful
 
I don't see how the trace corresponds to the inner product. Is this the map between the column vector f and the symmetric matrix A?
f=(f1,f2,f3)^T --> A = ( (f1, 1/2 f2), (1/2 f2, f3) )
since (x y) . A . (x y)^T = f1 x^2 + f2 xy + f3 y^2
If this is true then for two vectors f -> A and g -> B the diagonal elements of the product A*B are
A*B = ( (f1*g1 +f2*g2/4 , blah ) , (blah, f2*g2/4 + f3*g3) )
The trace of this matrix is Tr(A*B) = f1*g1 + f2*g2/2 + f3*g3
but this is not the inner product of f and g:
<f,g> = f1*g1 + f2*g2 + f3*g3

I'm sure your result is correct (that the representation is unitary) so how does one fix the proof?
Thanks
Alex
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K