Register to reply

1= .9999999999999999999.

by Demodocus
Tags: None
Share this thread:
Oct7-05, 10:16 PM
P: 7
Here it is...

1/3= .33333333333...........

2/3= .6666666666.........


3/3= .9999999999.......


1= .999999999........


I think that this "paradox" means that there is a problem with our definition of infinity. At least, the definition needs to be refined. Does this mean that 1 is not equal to one, or is .9999999... another name for one? I think this topic needs to be adressed.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
Oct7-05, 10:19 PM
HW Helper
P: 660
Oh no, I remember a long one discussing this. Something about convergence, but I'll sit back and watch :)
Oct7-05, 10:49 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,155
Here, read this thread COMPLETELY.

Oct8-05, 08:03 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 39,568
1= .9999999999999999999.

Ouch! Another one. Demodocus- there is nothing wrong with "our" definition of infinity (actually, I can't speak for yours). Yes, 0.9999.... is just another name for 1 (that, I must say, is put very nicely). Our definition of "base 10 enumeration system" is such that 0.9999.... means the sum of the infinite series 9/10+ 9/100+ 9/100+ ... which is a geometric series that can be shown to converge to 1.

Register to reply