Pairs of primes separated by a single number are called prime pairs

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EvLer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime Primes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of prime pairs, specifically pairs of prime numbers that are separated by a single integer. Participants explore the claim that the integer between such prime pairs is always divisible by 6, assuming both primes are greater than 6. The conversation includes various proofs and reasoning related to this claim.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the integer between two prime pairs (x) is divisible by 6, providing reasoning based on divisibility by 2 and 3.
  • One participant illustrates that if x is between primes x and x+2, then x must be even (hence divisible by 2) and also divisible by 3, leading to the conclusion that x is divisible by 6.
  • Another participant presents a different approach, stating that numbers can be expressed in the form of 6k, 6k+1, etc., and concludes that the number between twin primes must be of the form 6n, thus divisible by 6.
  • Some participants express confusion or seek clarification regarding the reasoning presented, indicating that not all explanations are universally understood.
  • A later reply notes an exception to the claim, pointing out that the pair (3, 5) does not fit the rule since the number between them (4) is not divisible by 6.
  • Another participant mentions an observation that the sum of two twin primes is always divisible by 12, linking it to the divisibility of the middle number by 6.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally present multiple competing views and reasoning regarding the divisibility of the number between prime pairs. There is no consensus on a single proof or explanation, and some participants express confusion about certain arguments.

Contextual Notes

Some arguments rely on specific assumptions about the nature of prime numbers and their distribution, and there are unresolved questions regarding the clarity and validity of certain proofs presented.

EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
here's one more:
pairs of primes separated by a single number are called prime pairs. Example: 17 and 19 are a pair. Prove that the number between prime pair is always divisible by 6 (assuming both numbers are greater than 6).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suppose x, x+2 are prime pairs. We need to show x+1 is divisible by 6. Well it is divisible by 2, because if it weren't, both x and x+2 would be, and so they wouldn't be primes, but they are. It is also divisible by 3 because if it weren't, one of x and x+2 would be (since in any set of 3 consecutive numbers, one of them is divisible by 3), and so one of them wouldn't be prime, but they are. x+1 is divisible by 3 and 2, hence by 6.
 
yup... that's how i solved it...
 
To show that the number x between a prime pair is divisible by
6, I show that it is divisible by 2 and 3.
picture: p x (p+2)
The picture shows the prime pair p and (p+2) and the number x in between.

(i) Show that x is divisible by 2:
Either the number x is odd or even. We know that one number left from x is a
prime number (see picture) and this prime number can't be divided by 2, that
means it is odd. After this (odd) prime number follows an even number,
and this number is x.

(ii) Show that x is divisible by 3:
When we examine how the multiples of 3 are distributed, we discover the
following pattern:
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
3 - - 6 - - 9 - - 12 - - and so on. The two minus signs stand for
two numbers between the multiples of 3.
In general:
x - - (x+3) - - and so on.
There are TWO numbers between two multiples of 3, which can't be divided by 3 (the TWO minus signs).

Now let's examine the first picture:
p x (p+2)
with p and (p+2) the prime pair and x the number in between.

Since p is prime, it is not a multiple of 3 and therefore can be replaced by a minus sign:
p x (p+2) turns into - x (p+2).
Now the question is, whether the second minus sign is located LEFT or RIGHT from the minus sign.
Let's assume that the second minus sign is located right (replace x by a minus sign), therefore:
- x (p+2) turns into - - (p+2). But this can't be since (p+2) is not a multiple of 3.
Therefore the second minus sign must be located left:
- x (p+2) turns into - - x (p+2), which means that x is a multiple of 3.
QED.
Please tell me whether my solution is understandable. [/color]
 
Last edited:
yes it is..
 
I solved it this way.
The solution should have something to do with number 6.
Nos. can only be of the form:
6k, 6k+1, 6k+2, 6k+3, 6k+4, 6k+5 (k is an integer)
Out of these the only types which can be primes are 6k+1 and 6k+5 (ie 6(k+1)-1).
Evidently two twin primes will be of the form, 6n-1 and 6n+1.(n is an integer)
The number between them is 6n, definitely divisible by 6.
Hence Proved
 
ssj5harsh, I don't understand your solution :confused:
 
ssj5harsh said:
6k, 6k+1, 6k+2, 6k+3, 6k+4, 6k+5 (k is an integer)
He is essentially saying that 6k will be divisible by 2 and 3 (6 is, after all, a factor). Hence, 6k+2 will also be divisible by 2 (adding two doesn't change divisibility by 2), 6k+3 by 3, 6k+4 by 2 (adding +2+2). Thus, only 6k+1 and 6k+5 have the option of being prime. Thus, the number between them must be 6k, divisible by 6. I think.
 
Thanks for the explanation LarrrSDonald.
 
  • #10
EvLer said:
here's one more:
pairs of primes separated by a single number are called prime pairs. Example: 17 and 19 are a pair. Prove that the number between prime pair is always divisible by 6 (assuming both numbers are greater than 6).

It's true for all prime-pairs except 3-5
Between 3 and 5 there's 4, which is, in fact, not divisible by 6 o:)
 
  • #11
MizardX said:
It's true for all prime-pairs except 3-5
Between 3 and 5 there's 4, which is, in fact, not divisible by 6 o:)
But EvLer said:
EvLer said:
assuming both numbers are greater than 6
:-p
 
  • #12
Hmm..

I realized something,
the sum of the two twin primes is always divisible by 12.
Not unexpected, but fascinating nevertheless.
 
  • #13
ssj5harsh said:
I realized something,
the sum of the two twin primes is always divisible by 12.
Not unexpected, but fascinating nevertheless.

That would follow immediately from the fact that the middle number is a multiple of 6 : (6k-1) + (6k+1) = 12k. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K