Historical information on density

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the historical understanding of density, particularly the misconception that densities can be added linearly. The original poster seeks information on who first recognized this principle and any additional historical context related to density.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the historical context of density, questioning the linearity of density addition. There is mention of Archimedes' Principle as a related concept, with some participants reflecting on its implications and historical significance.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing resources and insights. Some have acknowledged the relevance of Archimedes' work, while others are reconsidering their initial interpretations of historical experiments related to density.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the historical aspect of density, with participants expressing interest in the origins of certain principles and the limitations of historical methods used to determine material properties.

koroljov
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
This may or may not be the correct forum to ask this, but let's ask it anyway.

I am looking for historical information on density.
It is so that densities can not be added lineary:
A material containing 10% of material 1 and 90% of material 2 will not have a density of 10% * the density of material 1 + 90% * the density of material 2.

I'd like to know who was the first that realized this.

(any other historical information on density is also welcome).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
While it's not strictly speaking density, Archimedes' Principle is related.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes
http://physics.about.com/cs/fluiddynamics/g/archimedes.htm

This may get you started.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Aha, I have re-read the site and have to change what I said. He probably did not do the experiment to determine if the kings crown was made of pure gold by simply using the law of the lever and the displacement of water. The problem with that method is that it is too small of a displacement of water when comparing pure gold to gold-silver alloy. To overcome this, he balanced the known gold and the crown on a lever. Then he put the lever into the water. If it remained level, then they both had the same volume. The Crown is quite nice too!
http://www.math.drexel.edu/%7Ecrorres/Archimedes/contents.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's a good one. I should have thought of that one. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K