Is From Free Trade to Forced Trade by Peter Urmetzer worth reading?

  • Thread starter Thread starter student007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book trade
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

"From Free Trade to Forced Trade" by Peter Urmetzer presents free trade as a neutral concept, emphasizing its role in enhancing efficiency through comparative advantage. The author argues that free trade enables countries, such as the US, to specialize in certain industries while allowing others to benefit from exports. This dynamic leads to lower prices and increased efficiency, although it also presents drawbacks, such as job losses in less competitive industries like the US steel sector. The book challenges readers to consider both the benefits and the potential downsides of free trade.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of comparative advantage in economics
  • Familiarity with the principles of free trade
  • Knowledge of economic efficiency and its implications
  • Awareness of the impact of globalization on local industries
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of comparative advantage in depth
  • Explore case studies on the effects of free trade agreements
  • Investigate the economic impact of globalization on specific industries
  • Analyze the balance between free trade benefits and job displacement
USEFUL FOR

Economists, policymakers, students of international trade, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of free trade and its implications on global economies.

student007
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Has anyone read "from free trade to forced trade" by Peter Urmetzer? I just finished reading it. It was a bit of an eye opener - it describes free trade as a neutral activity - not good or bad. Great book
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give some of the major points on why the author thinks this way?
 
I'm guessing the author is basically arguing for free trade based on the concept of comparative advantage. For example say you are a lawyer and have no secretary. You have the ability to type well, organize your schedule, etc. But wouldn't you be better off if you highered a secretary anyway? If you highered a secretary, you have more time and energy etc. to focus on being a better lawyer. This is sort of what comparative advantage is. Free trade supposedly allows everyone to be better off by allowing some countries (like the US) to focus being more efficient in certain industries, while allowing other countries to gain from exporting goods to that country (although that country could make those goods it imports). In the end, free trade should result in lower prices for everyone while increasing efficiency in certain industries and allowing other countries (poorer possibly) to benefit. There are some draw back such as certain industries not becoming efficient enough with their foreign counterparts resulting in lost jobs etc. (such as the US steel industry). This is why the author may be claiming trade as a neutral. It has its gains and drawbacks.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K