Recognitions:
Homework Help

## Notation: ln_2(k)?

I started looking at a proof I had set aside for myself to read some time ago* and wondered if I was missing something in the notation.
In several of the author's formulas, he writes $$\ln_2k$$. Is this just $$\log_2k=\lg k$$?

On a related note, since I see this as well: I've seen notation of the form $$f^k$$ used in two different ways -- $$f^k(x)=f(x)\cdot f^{k-1}(x)$$ (usually trig functions or logs) and $$f^k(x)=f(f^{k-1}(x))$$ (usually number-theoretic functions like $$\sigma$$, but I suppose function inverses are like this in a sense). Is there any rhyme or reason behind the choice to use one or the other as convention? Is one gaining popularity with respect to the other over time?

* Pierre Dusart, "The kth Prime is Greater than $$k(\ln k+\ln\ln k-1)$$ for $$k\geq2$$", Math. Comp. 68/225 Jan 1999, pp. 411-415.

Edit: I'm such a fool. The author does define it after all, I just missed it in my carelessness. $$\ln_2k=\ln\ln k$$ in this paper.
 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> New language discovery reveals linguistic insights>> US official: Solar plane to help ground energy use (Update)>> Four microphones, computer algorithm enough to produce 3-D model of simple, convex room
 Recognitions: Science Advisor Notation can be a funny thing, particularly when talking about superscipts. It is important for the author to define precisely what is meant in a given context. Sometimes it could mean the kth derivative as opposed to the two definitions you described. For the log notation, once you have the subscript 2, it doesn't matter whether you write ln or log. However it is customary to use ln without a subscript to refer to base e (natural) log.

Recognitions:
Homework Help
I've seen $$f^{(n)}$$ for that, but never just $$f^n$$ for the nth derivative.