How Do You Solve an Augmented Matrix with Infinite Solutions Using Vectors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kamui8899
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving an augmented matrix with infinite solutions using vector notation. The matrix provided simplifies to a form indicating infinite solutions, specifically resulting in the equations y = (4/3)z - 5/3 and x = -2((4/3)z - 5/3) - 3z + 4. The user seeks confirmation on the correctness of their vector representation of the solution. A participant points out an error in the row reduction process, indicating that the bottom row should not be zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of augmented matrices and their row reduction
  • Familiarity with vector notation and representation
  • Knowledge of solving linear equations
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the process of row reduction for augmented matrices
  • Study vector representation of solutions in linear algebra
  • Learn about the implications of infinite solutions in systems of equations
  • Explore the concept of parameterization in linear equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as anyone involved in solving systems of equations and understanding vector spaces.

kamui8899
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I have an augmented matrix:

1 2 3 4
0 3 4 5
3 12 1 2

Now this matrix simplifies to:

1 2 3 4
0 3 4 5
0 0 0 0

So there are infinite solutions, however I have to write all the solutions to the equation. I wanted to do this with vectors.

So I first solved for x and for y and got:

y = (4/3)z - 5/3

x = -2((4/3)z - 5/3) -3z + 4

So now what do I do, can I simply write the answer as:

<-2((4/3)z - 5/3) -3z + 4, (4/3)z -5/3, z>

which then goes to

z<-2(4/3) - 3, 4/3, 1> + <-2(-5/3) +4, 5/3, 0>

?

This doesn't seem correct to me though. Did I solve the equation correctly, and if so, is what I wrote the correct answer for finding all solutions to the equation?

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You did the reduction wrong. The bottom row does not become 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K