Proof of Identity: $\phi(P+Q)=\int_{\partial D}\phi \nabla \phi \cdot \n \ds$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tony11235
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The identity \(\int_{\partial D}\phi \nabla \phi \cdot \n \, ds = \int \int_{D} (\phi \nabla^2 \phi + \nabla \phi \cdot \nabla \phi) \, dA\) can be proven by substituting \(\phi\) with \(P + Q\) on the left side and deriving the right side. The proof utilizes the divergence theorem, where \(F\) is defined as \(\phi \nabla \phi\). The application of the divergence theorem confirms that \(\nabla \cdot F\) equals \((\phi \nabla^2 \phi + \nabla \phi \cdot \nabla \phi)\), establishing the identity without the need for complex vector calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically divergence and gradient operations.
  • Familiarity with the divergence theorem and its applications.
  • Knowledge of second derivatives and their notation, particularly \(\nabla^2\).
  • Basic integration techniques in multiple dimensions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the divergence theorem in detail, including its proofs and applications.
  • Learn about vector calculus identities and their derivations.
  • Explore the properties of gradients and Laplacians in various coordinate systems.
  • Practice integrating vector fields over surfaces and volumes.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students who are working with vector calculus and need to understand identities involving gradients and divergences.

Tony11235
Messages
254
Reaction score
0
Prove the identity [tex]\int_{\partial D}\phi \nabla \phi \cdot \n \ds = \int \int_{D} (\phi \nabla^2 \phi + \nabla \phi \cdot \nabla \phi) \dA[/tex]
Can I just let [tex]\phi[/tex] be equal to P + Q, substitute into the left side, and try to derive the right side? This is a weird looking identity by the way.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Its actually quite easy, without any vector calculus needed.
(f*gx)x= fx*gx + f*gxx

if you sum these up for y and z derivatives, you will get

Div[f*del(g)] = del(f) dot del(g) + f*del^2(g)

integrate both sides and use divergence theorem.

I apologize for having to write div for divergence, dot for dot product and del for the del operator, but i don't know how to do those fancy fonts.
 
So basically let F be equal to [tex]\phi \nabla \phi[/tex], then [tex]\nabla \cdot F[/tex] is equal to [tex](\phi \nabla^2 \phi + \nabla \phi \cdot \nabla \phi)[/tex]. What do you know it's the divergence theorem!
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K