Is this Friction Problem Really That Simple? A Scientific Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmf322
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Statics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a friction problem presented in a textbook, with participants questioning its simplicity and the accuracy of the provided solution. The scope includes theoretical analysis and problem-solving related to friction in a mechanical context.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses skepticism about the simplicity of the problem and invites others to explore its complexity.
  • Another participant suggests that the friction coefficient at the tips of the tongs could affect the solution, indicating that lower friction may lead to slippage.
  • A participant mentions attempting to sum moments to find the normal force at the tongs' tips, seeking validation for their approach.
  • There are claims that the problem in the textbook is incorrect, with one participant stating there is no solution, while another believes a correct solution exists.
  • One participant speculates that if the pulling force is built up from zero, the jaws may slip off, questioning the conditions under which a solution could be found.
  • Another participant discusses the need to solve for the minimum value of the friction coefficient that would allow the system to function without slippage.
  • Confusion arises regarding the assignment of the problem by a professor, with participants questioning the rationale behind it given its perceived inaccuracies.
  • One participant reassures another that their work appears correct for the given value of the friction coefficient.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the problem or the correctness of the textbook solution. Multiple competing views exist regarding the nature of the problem and the necessary conditions for a solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential inaccuracies in the textbook problem and express uncertainty about the implications of varying the friction coefficient and the normal force. The discussion highlights the complexity of the problem and the assumptions involved in finding a solution.

jmf322
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Ok this problem seems way too simple. I have worked it out without using any of the dimensions given.

The problem is http://www.engr.colostate.edu/~elblunto/problem.jpg"

My work is http://www.engr.colostate.edu/~elblunto/jonwork.jpg"

I don't think the solution could be that easy. Anyone want to try and see if this is more complicated than I made it? Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What if the friction coefficient at the end of the tongs goes to zero? Youre solution doesn't take that into account. As the mu at the tong tips gets lower, you will be limited in how much weight you can pull, or the tongs will slip off.
 
Thanks for noticing Berkeman. I am going to attempt to sum the moments about C to solve for the normal force applied at the tips of the tongs. feel free to stop me if this is incorrect! thanks
 
P.s. That is hibbeler and the problem in the book is wrong. I found that out the hard way myself. There is no solution.
 
Last edited:
Cyrus,

It is Hibbeler, and the answer in the back of the book is incorrect. I am very confident there is a correct solution however.
 
cyrusabdollahi said:
P.s. That is hibbeler and the problem in the book is wrong. I found that out the hard way myself. There is no solution.
Really? It sure seems like there should be a solution -- the situation seems pretty physical. There probably is no solution if you have to build up the pulling force from zero, because zero initial normal force at the squeeze point would mean that the jaws would always slip off. But if the jaws could be held on the wood as the pulling force was built up to some number, and then they are released, it seems like you could solve for what force you could apply before they finally slipped off. Definitely let us know what you find. What's the wrong answer in the book, BTW?

Edit -- Hmm, maybe with the angles given and the mu, the jaws would always pull off. Maybe that's what's going on. Maybe it takes at least some minimum mechanical advantage on the squeeze point and some minimum mu for the jaws not to slip off?
 
you got it. Solve for the friction force given the value of mu. It will be
2F> P, sorry that won't work, as it is not in equilibrium anymore. The values are bogus. ;-)
 
the answer in the back is m = 54.9 kg

i will back back a little later to read your response a little more thoroughly. Thanks
 
Dont pay attention to what the book has, its wrong. To get a solution you will have to solve to find what the value of mu can be. Its really quite trivial, if you have a force of P to the left, then at each tong you must have a force of 1/2 P in the other direction, which means you have a force of P acting on the box. So you need to solve for what minimum value of mu will allow you to have a value of 1/2 P at each tong, or change the angle of the chains.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Cyrus,

So you are saying that I should disregard the given value of mu between the tongs and the pallet, and solve for the normal force, thus giving me the correct value of mu? So was my work correct for given value of mu?

I am confused because this problem was assigned by my professor. I don't understand why he would assign it if he knew it was a trick question. I am positive that he is aware of the problems inaccuracies.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
So you are saying that I should disregard the given value of mu between the tongs and the pallet, and solve for the normal force, thus giving me the correct value of mu?

Yep, and your work seems good too.

I am confused because this problem was assigned by my professor. I don't understand why he would assign it if he knew it was a trick question. I am positive that he is aware of the problems inaccuracies.

Nope, the book is wrong. Its not a trick question, its an improperly written problem in the book. Just bring it to his attention and ask for extra credit because you spotted a mistake, and then thank him that you do not use the 9th edition that had TONS of mistakes in it.
 
  • #12
lol thanks a lot for helping me out!
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K