Max Tempurature: Is There a Limit?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jake
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of maximum temperature, exploring whether there is a theoretical limit to temperature based on kinetic motion and relativistic principles. Participants examine the implications of the Planck temperature and its significance in the context of physics, particularly regarding high-energy scenarios like the Big Bang.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that there is no current theory predicting a maximum temperature, suggesting that heat, as kinetic motion, can increase without limit relativistically.
  • Others speculate that the Planck temperature, approximately 1.4 x 10^32 K, could serve as an upper limit, beyond which ordinary laws of physics may not apply.
  • One participant mentions that the Planck temperature is associated with conditions present at the time of the Big Bang.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between temperature and kinetic energy, with some participants noting that temperature is not directly tied to the speed of molecules but rather to their kinetic energy, which can increase indefinitely as mass approaches the speed of light.
  • Another participant highlights that the calculation of the Planck temperature involves fundamental constants such as the speed of light, h-bar, and gravitational constant, indicating a complex interplay of these factors at extreme energy levels.
  • One participant questions how relativistic motion can increase without limit, seeking clarification on the implications of the speed of light as a boundary.
  • There are references to the kinetic energy formula in relativity, emphasizing that as speed approaches the speed of light, kinetic energy—and thus temperature—can increase without bound.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the existence and implications of a maximum temperature. While some support the idea of the Planck temperature as a limit, others argue against the notion of a maximum temperature based on relativistic principles. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the relationship between temperature, kinetic energy, and relativistic motion involves complex assumptions and definitions that may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion also touches on the limitations of current theories in predicting maximum temperature.

Jake
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
What is the maximum tempurature? That is, if there is one. But since heat is just kinetic motion and kinetic motion has a limit in c, I would expect there must be a limit to how 'hot' things can become. Correct me if I'm wrong :wink:

Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
No current theory predicts a maximum temperature. Heat is kinetic motion, but relativistically that can increase without limit, and hence so can temperature (E=1/2mv^2 is only valid non-relativistically).

It is possible to speculate a maximum temperature using the Planck scale. Supposedly, energies greater than the Planck energy cannot be achieved, so this can be used to set an upper limit. This energy is:

[tex]E_p = h\sqrt{\frac{Gh}{c^5}} = 1.4*10^9J[/tex]

So a Planck temperature can be

[tex]T_p = E_p / k_B = 3.55*10^{32}K[/tex]
 
Jake said:
What is the maximum tempurature? That is, if there is one. But since heat is just kinetic motion and kinetic motion has a limit in c, I would expect there must be a limit to how 'hot' things can become. Correct me if I'm wrong :wink:

Thanks!

in some situations, perhaps all, the temperature of
1.4 x 1032 kelvin
known as the Planck temperature can serve as
a top of the scale.

It is basically the hottest temp around time of Big Bang

above this temperature ordinary laws of physics don't seem to apply

You can find the official recommended value of the Planck temp
listed at the US gov. site for the NIST (natl inst. of standards and technology)

or google "fundamental constants" and when you get to the NIST site select "universal constants"

you find it along with the speed of light and Planck's constant and G, the universal gravitational constant, and other really basic quantities

here is the NIST fundamental constants site

http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/

when you select "universal" there, you get
http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Category?view=html&Universal.x=74&Universal.y=9

and you see "Planck temperature"
I just went there to see what they actually said and it was
1.41679 x 1032 Kelvin

I see while i was typing, Zefram said something different which is, i guess, different by a factor of the square root of 2 pi.
what I am telling you is probably more widely accepted as Planck temp.
It uses the h-bar constant instead of the h constant which is bigger by a factor of 2 pi. Most people when they talk Planck units, in my experience, base them on h-bar. there is no one right way but being consistent leads to less confusion
 
Last edited:
How can relativistically motion can increase without limit? From whatever frame of refrence you are in, nothing can be moving faster than C, so how can there be no limit.

Just curious, thanks for the info :smile:
 
marcus said:
in some situations, perhaps all, the temperature of
1.4 x 1032 kelvin
known as the Planck temperature can serve as
a top of the scale.

It is basically the hottest temp around time of Big Bang

above this temperature ordinary laws of physics don't seem to apply

...

Thanks, I suppose that answers my question, but I'm just not clear as to why C can't be used.
 
Jake said:
Thanks, I suppose that answers my question, but I'm just not clear as to why C can't be used.

temperature scale is a kind of alternative scale to energy (the Boltzmann constant k relates the two-----E = kT)

temperature is not directly related to the speed of molecules moving in the air but to their kinetic energy (which involves their masses as well as their speeds)

as a massive object goes faster and faster, and approaches the speed c,
then its kinetic energy increases without bound

so the speed of light does not, by itself, provide us with an upper limit on temperature or on the kinetic energies of particles.


but h-bar steps in and says that as any kind of particle's total energy goes up its quantum wavelength shrinks, so intuitively highly energetic particles become more compact

then G (gravity) steps in and says that if something is very massive and concentrated very compactly it can collapse to a black hole under its own gravity.

So everything goes to hell at a certain level of energy.
Planck temperature is the temperature where that happens.

It is based not only on c, but also on h-bar and G. you have to use all three fundamental constants to calculate what it is.

Planck temperature is the temperature where even photons of light, in a space that hot, would be so energetic and have such short wavelength that even they would form black holes.

this may sound ridiculous but it is more or less right, and gives a notion of why there is an upper temperature limit that you have to calculate using c, hbar, G.
 
Ok thanks, it's all clear now :smile:

marcus said:
temperature scale is a kind of alternative scale to energy (the Boltzmann constant k relates the two-----E = kT)

temperature is not directly related to the speed of molecules moving in the air but to their kinetic energy (which involves their masses as well as their speeds)

as a massive object goes faster and faster, and approaches the speed c,
then its kinetic energy increases without bound

so the speed of light does not, by itself, provide us with an upper limit on temperature or on the kinetic energies of particles.


but h-bar steps in and says that as any kind of particle's total energy goes up its quantum wavelength shrinks, so intuitively highly energetic particles become more compact

then G (gravity) steps in and says that if something is very massive and concentrated very compactly it can collapse to a black hole under its own gravity.

So everything goes to hell at a certain level of energy.
Planck temperature is the temperature where that happens.

It is based not only on c, but also on h-bar and G. you have to use all three fundamental constants to calculate what it is.

Planck temperature is the temperature where even photons of light, in a space that hot, would be so energetic and have such short wavelength that even they would form black holes.

this may sound ridiculous but it is more or less right, and gives a notion of why there is an upper temperature limit that you have to calculate using c, hbar, G.
 
To wrap things up, kinetic energy in relativity is:

[tex]T = (\gamma-1)m_0c^2[/tex], where m0 is the rest mass, c is the speed of light, and [itex]\gamma[/itex] is the usual. Since [itex]\gamma[/itex] can increase without bounds as the speed v approaches c, so can kinetic energy, which is what temperature is based on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K