Dissident Dan
- 236
- 1
Do you think that instant run-off voting is a good idea that we should implement for governmental elections?
Instant Run-Off Voting (IRV), also known as the "Alternative Vote" or "Preferential Voting," allows voters to rank candidates, potentially preventing outcomes like the 2000 election debacle. However, it does not guarantee a candidate with a strong mandate, as evidenced by comparisons with the Condorcet method, which ensures that the most preferred candidate wins in head-to-head matchups. The discussion highlights concerns about governmental instability linked to proportional representation, particularly referencing the Israeli Knesset as an example of how minority parties can wield disproportionate power. Overall, participants advocate for systems that balance voter justice with governmental stability.
PREREQUISITESPolitical scientists, election reform advocates, and individuals interested in the dynamics of voting systems and their impact on governance.
Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) is also known as the "Alternative Vote" and "Preferential Voting." Voters rank the candidates as first, second, third, etc.
I think that either system is superior to a simple plurality.
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
Because you focus on justice in voting. But I think that anything that empowers minority parties leads to governmental instability. Look at the Knesset in Israel. They have proportional voting in their elections and tiny little sliver parties of fanatics have enormous power to swing votes. No thanks.
It's very responsive, with rubber bullets and pepper spray. No, you're right, Bush could have 100% popular disapproval and he would continue careening into wherever.I think that our government is not responsive enough to the people.