Recent content by 36grit

Time is the fourth dimension. My geometric conclusion of time is like is this: The first three dimensions are ofcourse, length, width, and depth. We represent these quite frequently with the letters x,y, and z. Where they intersect is normally represented by zero unless we are referring to...

I've recently come to the conclusion that infinite fields require infinite expansion. The universe is sea of time, and time is an infinite field. But in a "static instant" of time, the universe is finite.

I don't think matter is expanding. If it is then it's not at the same rate. I do think that gravity stars (black holes) shrink. They reinflate when their "feeding".

No way. No way all the mass in the universe was squeezed into the space of a pea. Just look at the neutron star. The electron is sqeezed down inside the nucleaous of the atom and they're still pretty big. If you squeezed them anymore they'd collapse into a gravity star, or black hole, if you...

If we are were expanding into nothing then, then we are probably expanding into nothing now. Is that to say, We are in the middle of a black hole? That's the closest comparison I can think of.

Is that to say that nothing is a possibility?

So, the acceptable theory to date is that: there was no space surrounding the entity. well, I guess with nothing on the otherside we'll just keep expanding and expanding well into the, um, nothing.

It is my understanding that at one time all matter in the universe was an object of near infinite density the size of a marble. My question is, was this "Marble" surrounded by space/time? if so, isn't the size of the mass relative to your position in that space time?

Shear Poetry in my eyes In the last paragraph you mention a surface of presence. Would this be comprised of mostly matter? It stands to reason that the future is probably made of the same thing as the past. Mostly distance and energy. I see know reason why there must be a beginning or an...

I feel like this question has at the very least spurred some imaginations. I appreciate the input and now I do have a better understanding. Space: Distance as bands of history imprinted by photons and energy forces and occupied by mass. One time I saw light from a pulsar bend around a...

How many steps are there? Do the electrons of heavy materials have more steps than those of lighter materials? do these photons somehow "wind up" the atom and keep it spinning and working?

The universe is the center. Therefore, no matter where you stand in the universe it appears that you are the center. It's a matter of perspective.

So, you basically saying that the space time fabric is a fabric of xyzt, influenced by a force that is absent and yet defines the present shockwave of the physical for a nothingth of a second and then becomes the past. I guess. I'll read a couple more times. It's hard to follow. Now I'm...

Well, I'm no physicist, but I do give these matters a lot of thought. Personally I like to think that parallel universes act indepentely of each other with the exception of a new universe created inside of an old universe. I think the new "big bang" would create a gravitaional wave, traveling at...

To me it seems plausable, but then again I think the big bang was an explosion of history recorded in a bandwidth of linear distance created by a single instance of present time (we call an atom) being formed in a disk of solid gravity spinning faster than time except in the center where the...