this is very similar to how i first joined this forum a year ago, if you want to you can dig through the old threads and see what was written, i remeber honestRoseWater answered a question of mine very nicely, her responce might help u. (sry i can't remember the name)
maybe you should word it like this:
(We perceive and object is present) or ( we perceive no such object)
that clarifies what you said to meas for "the world is not as simple as we maybe would like it to be"
does this go against ockman's razor? i have always been told that the simplest solution...
something that doesn't make sense is when the person says :
"In Case 2, where the fetus is a person and you don't know that, abortion is manslaughter. It's like driving over a man-shaped overcoat in the street at night or shooting toxic chemicals into a building that you're not sure is fully...
Agnostism is a logical stance because of the fact that you are questioning the belief of the person, and are Not getting a...direct, Truthful answer.
God has to exist or not exist( i changed my mind after posting something else)
But
The person Does NOT have to know that
therefore...
maybe there is a "It sort of exists" state?" or against some of PF debater's thoughts,i believe there is always a "I don't know" answer maybe that is 3 and 4?
i agree with sikz for the most part. we can imagine other dimensions ( also the only other 1 i can mentally visualize is time, and not the one that is perpendicual to the "x,y,z" dimensions ) but we know what the shadow for an "4 dimensional cube" is in 3 dimensions, but we can't see the cube...
i fail to see the joke, can someone help me out? everything that i read seems to be fairly logical. i have been thinking most of the same things about perspectives and it being like a "grid", but to me a better metaphor would be a looking at choas with multipule smudged looking glass. one thing...
my name? that i can answer :P , and today is probably going to suck...cant be certain but
will we ever get to a point where we are content? that depends on the question. How to fix a car has a definite, finite answer, chances are you will get satisfied by a how-to-book. What is the meaning of...
i would trust the most trustworthy person :P j/k, i know that isn't a real answer
if it was from a political perspective i would trust the person with the least influence/power.
luckyly I am not, I would trust the most loving person because it would not be in their nature to harm you...
im not so sure that humans could not progress father. i believe the only problem with it is that to progress we would have to not be threatened by anything. i believe that humans are only mean when they feel threatened, so if we remove most threats we would have a much nicer/friendlier culture...
My personal view is this:
1) sane is the average of a population's "mentality/beliefs".
2)ppl like donald trump, have something different from the average person, maybe greedier or more aggressive, which makes them insane to a degree
3) someone who runs for president wants more power...