Recent content by agnick5

  1. A

    I Entanglement and FTL signaling in professional scientific literature

    I probably should have stopped reading this thread after @vanhees71 and @Nugatory explained many things to me. But the bolded part above remains the basis for my previous questions. I realize fully that it is not me who has come to this realization and that this "problem" (not a problem for...
  2. A

    I Entanglement and FTL signaling in professional scientific literature

    Thank you, sincerely, for the detailed response ( @vanhees71 @gentzen). I have a better understanding now and appreciate you taking the time. Your words are not lost on me, and I will continue to consider them in detail. I feel I now have a little bit better understanding and will commence...
  3. A

    I Entanglement and FTL signaling in professional scientific literature

    Thank you for the responses. @PeroK @vanhees71 @Grinkle (Who was also kind enough to message me and explain certain things). I have read in detail all of the responses, including this entire thread and many, many others. I am quite literally trying to understand. And I don't know how else...
  4. A

    I Entanglement and FTL signaling in professional scientific literature

    I am new here and not a physicist. I apologize in advance if I mis-use any terminology or am not exact. What I do not understand from Vanhees responses here (and everywhere else) is the following: 1) There is no "spooky action at a distance or FTL communication" due to the microcausility...
Back
Top