Recent content by ahamster

You misunderstand my meaning, and perhaps I didn't express in proper way. I mean that all people will agree with the same result in harmony.

I hope to see here real scientists that really fulfil Einstein's teaching that the personality and respecting other people is the first requirement to be a real scientist.

pervect, I totally agree what you said. That's also something that I want to say: ...whether that cat is alive or dead. You'll never get one observer saying "live" and another observer saying "dead"... I mean for two realities we can only choose one here. All observers here will only...

OK, I don't talk about fate. I just wish to understand the modified train paradox but it seems that no one is able to explain the result for observers inside and outside the train. I don't find a real scientist here though I agree that I'm still learning. Very disappointed with this forum.

pervect, thanks for your repeated explanation with patience. To my understanding, do you mean that in case if the rocket man doesn't die, then all observers in any relative speed will get the same result that rocket man is still alive. I'm still not convinced that a man will have the same...

"Whether a person will die or not" is relative I know that simultaneous condition is also changed relative to rocket man, so I also mentioned that the two knives are in same frequency but did not want to mention whether they're in same pace or not. Actually I think the most important point is...

"Whether a person will die or not" is relative Barn and pole paradox is a famous controversial topic. (IMHO, Barn and pole is not paradox. There's no paradox in this universe.) However, if the case is modified as follow: Imagine that the two barns become two big sharp knives, and they are...