Recent content by Amazed

Thank you profusely for answering the question. So, if there is a lot of 'stuff' that is not made up by any of 'that', then what is 'that stuff', then what are they made up by? So, one just decides what is matter and what is not, depending on what they are 'doing', correct? I thought in a...

If there is still no one single definition of 'particle' in physics, then what is 'it' that people who do physics look at, discuss, and talk about, exactly? Uncovering this answer will help tremendously in the formation of the two very big theories. Yes. If the claims following my 'surely'...

Why is there not a concept about 'All existing matter, space, energy considered as a whole', which plays any role in your actual physical theories? How are you meant to , study, observe, and measure the whole when you have not yet even arrived at a concept of it? Is this a rhetorical...

Did you write that paper? If no, then I am still more interested in how you define a 'particle' at the most fundamental level. I note that you did not respond to what I said in response to your claim about particles being excited states of an underlying physical field, if the physical field...

I am supposedly still way too vague in regards to 'what', exactly? How do you define the word 'thing'? I have already provided my definition. Is your definition more specific and provides more clarity? Are any of those things that you listed not fundamentally made up of nor created by matter?

Thank you, this is very helpful indeed.

I had already changed my question from '... made up 'of' matter', to '... made up 'by' matter', sorry.

Okay. I used that word to refer to a 'thing', no matter what. Now, I know that using the same word or part of the word in a definition of a word does not suffice, but a 'thing' is being defined as an object that one need not, cannot, does not wish to give a specific name to, or does not have a...

I would prefer to delve into and and look at and see how you define a particle at the most fundamental level instead. See, if particles are excited states of an, already, underlying physical field, (often called whatever), then surely the 'underlying physical field' consists of, or is made up...

Okay great. What is 'the math', or the math symbol, for 'All existing matter, space, energy considered as a whole'? So, could this explain why there is so much disagreement, conflict, and/or controversy among those who do 'physics'? After 'the maths' is known through words and what some call...

Thank you very much. Is there anything that is not fundamentally made up by any of these things?

How about if the question, itself, is ambiguous to you are anyone else, then the ground rule laid out is, Just ask me an open question, from an open perspective, for clarification. The best way I found to find and obtain clarity is to just ask open questions, for clarification. Also, to me...

Thank you. I was not aware of this. In which physics textbooks does it state that there are, or are not things, which are fundamentally not made up by matter, itself? After I look in the physics textbooks that you informed me about I will come back here with specific questions for...

It may well not matter that much. But, then again, it may come to light that it did actually really matter very much.

Okay.