Recent content by aura

rest mass remains const even if the atom moves! even if vel during its motion changes!...Mo remains const so does Lo M=Mo/sqrt(1-vsqr/csqr) Mo always remain const irrespective of whether the particle moves or not...its M that changes but i am talking about Mo..vel is not any intrinsic...

Do you know that there is something called as " rest mass" which remains constant even if the particle moves and is the intrinsic property of the particle.As the numeric const of the size was compared with velocity, i gave this example.i already mentioned the word "stationary" while commenting...

well i am writing in cool manner...first time dilation and length contraction are part of relativity which i am NOT discarding...i am talking of a single ref frame...say Earth (as an isolated system) in that ref frame when we measure size of a stationary atom, it remains same but speed need not...

i think you didn't care to read the line where i wrote forget about relativity for time being as i knew someone will insert it to prove useless things not related to my explanation...here people are so indulged in finding error that they are talking useless..if you are so interested in finding...

What is light? Its having both wave and particle nature. Hard core facts---- it consists of certain particles which we named as photons and the quantum physics has proved its existence.Then optical phenomenon like diffraction, interference, refraction,polarization etc have proved its wave...

i don't understand how people can correlate size of atoms with speed of light...size of anything is not a variable whereas speed can be variable...i am getting agitated sorry..its purely underestimating the question...how can 1 compare size and planks const etc etc with speed of light? the...

thanks for trying it out ... i will try to solve it... thanks!

i posted ONE question and what you told was just the explanation of something that i asked to illustrate my point in original question.so your every answer should relate to the first question even if u are answering the 2nd one...sound waves are longitudinal and requires medium in no way...

wow i just noticed that someone called madness :biggrin: also had posted this sometimes before...i have read relativity and i have solved problems considering C a const as that is the fundamental law of relativity but still i am not convinced ahy its a const as only einstein said was that (i...

My question is in my first post if you care to read that...i am not supposed to repeat that again and again in every post. my posts are well linked to my original Q but your ans doesn't have any correlation with the original Q..thats why i said so...try finding your fault rather than just...

well i just meant that is it not possible that our observation is limiting ourselves somewhere? anyway it has been in a lot in disussion so i am not quite enthusiastic abt discussing it all over again.only wanted to know other's opinions here. i will have this curiosity if not others that why...

well this is the description of what the principle of relativity states...but again as EM wave holds good is nothing of much significance as light is a form of EM wave...so well i reiterate that why its so that the properties of this particular wave does not change while they do for all other...

what you are saying is there is no means to measure the speed when we are in the system that's true but every system in motion has its own velocity and the velocity of any other object will depend on the vel of the ref frame of observer but the same is not true incase of light though this holds...

question is to find the curl v and not v...what you have in mind?

oops! a big printing mistake...thats eigen vector...nx,ny,nz now can u solve this at least the explanation...