Recent content by bodycode

  1. B

    I I say that this experiment confirms Schrodinger's Cat....

    Thank you. That's actually what I thought, I know that he wasn't talking about macro-sized objects. He used the example to actually clear up a common mistake made with the Copenhagen interpretation, as told to me from another poster and merely used the cat in a box example, as a very crude...
  2. B

    I I say that this experiment confirms Schrodinger's Cat....

    Gotcha. Thanks. But it turned out, that his equations were later confirmed on a quantum level? I think I asked the wrong question. All I'm asking, is if this experiment exploits quantum super-position. After all, if it wasn't possible, the creation of a Qubit wouldn't be possible?
  3. B

    I I say that this experiment confirms Schrodinger's Cat....

    I know that. Awe. come on. Of course not! Don't take me literally! All I am saying, is that this experiment, exploits super-position on a quantum level only (where phenomenon like that can only happen, and, all the time, every moment) That's all. I'm still probably wrong, as usual. heh heh.
  4. B

    I I say that this experiment confirms Schrodinger's Cat....

    That's what I'm talking about (of course), superposition. Two states simultaneously (on a quantum level). That's all I'm saying'. And this experiment exploited that. BTW, the cat wasn't meant to say anything about this being possible macroscopically. I also give a quick-search link to the line...
  5. B

    I I say that this experiment confirms Schrodinger's Cat....

    Why is that? In 2005, the National Institute of Standards and Technology successfully created six atoms that were simultaneously in spin-up and spin-down states. To me that sounds like two states at once. Here's the link to that article...
  6. B

    I I say that this experiment confirms Schrodinger's Cat....

    Ok, but isn't this the quintessential example of that thought experiment, that is, an object being in two states simultaneously, the confirmation of that thought experiment regardless of it being a macroscopic object? After all, he was just using an example to describe a quantum effect, or...
  7. B

    I I say that this experiment confirms Schrodinger's Cat....

    I'm having a fun little argument with my wife, about an article posted on www.sciencedaily.com. I say that the article CONFIRMS that Schrodinger was RIGHT. My WIFE says that this confirms that Schrodinger is WRONG. The article concerns the quantum techniques used creating the shortest pulse of...
  8. B

    Welcome to PF! Introduce Yourself and Join the Physics Community

    Hi everyone, I'm bodycode and I'm new here at the Physics forums
Back
Top