Recent content by Brainiac2

Globular cluster stars are more likely to mass-transfer that way.

Relative to what reference frame is the Earth not moving?

Speak and write and read both English and Spanish fluently. Can understand and read some Italian and and a bit more of Portuguese.

And you believe that "everywhere" was created by the BB-correct?

Thanks. The way you express it is definitely the right way.

Doesn't the upward velocity of the elevator itself create an artificial gravity that has to be factored into these calculations?

If you mean that the source of gravity-matter-doesn't decrease or weaken in its ability to exert the same gravitational force as it uses that force, then you are right-it doesn't. An object of a certain mass will continue to exert the same gravitational force at the same intensity forever as...

Wouldn't it be logical to assume that if the singularity is infinite that it's gravitation attraction would continue regardless of how far matter is pulled in? That it can't have a stationary center because if it did then it wouldn't be infinite?

Wouldn't the photons and cosmic rays reaching us from the past be much bigger if that shrinking scenario were true?

Atmosphere is the reason why Venus' temperature is a bit higher than Mercury's even though Mercury is closer to the sun.

Have you considered the Eridanus Supervoid or Great Void?

When the laser is suddenly turned off the light freezes for a fraction of a second within the gas only to resume after the laser is turned back on .

That's mind boggling!

That's exactly what I meant. That space expands so fast in certain regions that light can't traverse them completely as it otherwise would if space were not expanding. That's why the present detectable universe is expected to become eventually undetectable. The light will be "attempting" to...

Shooting a laser through super-cooled sodium atoms will slow the light to 34mph.