Recent content by BrianG

If it's inappropriate, delete it. I'm just looking for a single experiment on CO2 and temperature, and if I can't find one, I want to know why. I think my post is helpful, we disagree. You decide.

Full Text of Translated Letter By 61 German Scientists: Open Letter - Climate Change Bundeskanzleramt Frau Bundeskanzerlin Dr. Angela Merkel Willy-Brandt-Strabe 1 10557 Berlin # Vizerprasident Dipl. Ing. Michael Limburg 14476 Grob Glienicke Richard-Wagner-Str. 5a Grob Glienicke...

You say, "Trying to reproduce the entire atmosphere is not something you do in a lab." then you cite an experiment that would necessarily be faulty: http://www.espere.de/Unitedkingdom/water/uk_watexpgreenhouse.htm And you say this is a teaching tool in schools? What are they teaching...

I directly address the ESPERE experiment you cite: http://www.espere.de/Unitedkingdom/water/uk_watexpgreenhouse.htm The data is extremely limited, reduced to one twenty minute run with four data points for each of the two samples. The work isn't peer reviewed, isn't attributed to any...

The greenhouse effect is so weak, it's impossible to duplicate AGW in the lab or the field. These experiments aren't peer reviewed, can't be duplicated and no responsible researcher or lab has claimed credit.

It's too bad we can't a greenhouse gas' ability to change temperature compared to a control sample, like any other science. We have to take it on faith that the theory is correct. Just like religious belief.

It's the lack of an experimental test that shows a 300ppm difference in an atmosphere's CO2 causing the smallest measurable degree of warming. CO2 doesn't absorb heat from IR; it merely scatters it all around. Heat still flows from hot to cold. The greenhouse effect of a large amount of CO2...

What your saying is pure speculation and theory, that changing a small amount of CO2 will have an effect on temperature. It takes a container 40 meters in diameter to detect neutrinos, are you telling me neutrino/matter interactions are stronger than the greenhouse warming effect? What about...

Perhaps you could post a SINGLE experiment showing a temperature increase with two samples, one at 200ppm CO2, or more and the other at 500ppm CO2 or less, something in the range our contemporary atmosphere. Even a field experiment would be satisfactory; we’ve done controlled releases of...

Mainly, we all agree CO2's greenhouse effect is too weak to measure experimentally. Bummer, pseudo science strikes again.

It's a real shame our educational system has sunk so low, this is the state of our popular science:

Sorry, I thought this forum was about experimental tests of CO2's effect on temperature when exposed to IR. Bye.

I can experimentally test gravity, how come this unknown researcher at an unknown lab wants this test to remain anonymous? What other labs are doing this work? What does the effect look like with CO2 concentrations at historic levels?

No, by skeptics I mean folks who question the efficacy of climate change mitigation. Climate change is undeniable, the climate isn't static. If it was, it wouldn't be impossible to isolate a variable like CO2. Do you really think that experiment is very good? How come it lasts only twenty...

No matter how large the container, no matter which greenhouse gas, how strong the light source, how long the trial run, you can't experimentally find a temperature change from CO2's greenhouse effect. Is that because it's too small to measure or is climate mitigation inherently untestable...