Recent content by ceebs

So is this crash down to equipment failure? or radiation effected electronics?

So is that saying there's more C137 in that trench, than escaped from Chernobyl?

Happy? I suppose that the police will know that hippies with geiger counters are on their way to their dealers.

Does it fit with the number of rod assemblages that TEPCO has published as being in the pool?

Well if they take questions, we need the contact addresses of those two to send them questions to ask

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNBKPRVckIU Tepco robot film

I only remember talk of drilling holes into prevent explosives in reactor buildings 5 and 6, but I may be wrong

looking further at this I came across this That I haven't noticed here http://www.nirs.org/factsheets/bwrfact.htm"

I was thinking Insect myself

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/15_22.html" Now that's about 40 hours, according to their figures quoted higher up the page they TEPCO are pumping 7 tons per hour into reactor 2, which makes 280 tons of water, not even half the amount needed to replace the water level in the tunnel. in...

Because nothing says everything is under control like the government doing a runner http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=127294"

one major difference between the RPV and the Trieste is that the pressure is on the inside, so you're dealing with tensile stress rather than compressive stress that you were in the subs design

I see that and can only be reminded of this http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/369625.stm"

With the high readings, is it in any way possible to say how much to any degree more than "a lot"

So does that imply that the problem at reactor 1 is worse than at the other two? in that the results there seem to be following expected decay curves Even though the major problems such as pressure vessel puncturing are all reported at reactors 2 and 3?