So more or less the evidence is solid and even the assumptions based on the evidence are more than likely solid as well.
Just like the "theory" of evolution.
Well I didn't hear it from a well respected physicist or anything, it's just my friend who's teacher in physics 101 (or whatever) told him that the holographic principle was completely inaccurate and has little to no evidence to support it.
I am not planning on taking classes but physics still...
well thanks everyone for making me feel stupid.
was my interpretation of the link correct or incorrect?
i mainly just want confirmation that what the link said is well supported by evidence.
if i take more time (something i don't have much of) then i could understand the link better, but...
so you think of it as like a 3d object/anomaly compressed into an almost 2d like size/state?
sorry if I am getting the wrong impression, I am in a little over my head here but i like how you don't talk down to me
do you know of studies supporting this hypothesis?
i was saying the exact same...
Can energy be created or destroyed? That's the laws of physics right?
There's a debate everyday about "something from nothing" and universe from nothing. Against the current laws of physics but they are subject to change.
And it's a hypothetical, hypotheticals have a purpose. What don't you...
okay I tried to read your link you posted, it was pretty technical but I think I get it a little bit. You say that the electrons are liquid under certain circumstances and solid under other circumstances.
Where did you find this ouWhere did you find this out, do you have any papers or studies...
I like that answer but it raises a few more questions for me.
I am a little bit confused on what you mean when you say the space is occupied by electrons.
Do you mean that the space has the potential for electrons to be occupying all of the space or that electrons are always occupying all of...
I didn't get an answer, more or less a confirmation on that "it's not classical communication but there is some sort of "communication" between the two particles."
You know, Not in the literal sense, but like cause and effect. 1 affects the other.
Right? I'm noob
Please post scientific analysys like measurements.
I want to see what they measured with measuring devices.
I tried searching Google. Couldn't find any good paper on the subject. Only answers that it's empty and that it's not empty.
Always contradictions when searching on Google!
More condescention...
Hypothetical questions can give real answers. I am simply trying to understand the nature of this reality and an answer to that specific question would help, even if only a little.
Like "if we could lift the Earth and drop it when would it reach terminal velocity and how...
Well it was just a hypothetical. "IF" we COULD change the spin, then we could use it, correct?
Just wondering. Idk why people are being so condescending.