Recent content by CHUKKY

Awesome i just taught about that. kk And so what you saying is that due to the fact that electrons need to drift along the curved path, electric field intensity changes and Maxwell's law then avail right?if I am right reply me. And thank you very much for resolving this issue if my post is...

but wld displacement current avail for short conductor?nd it was a steady current.

but is their a way to show that no matter the dimension of the conductor passing through the loop the integral of the magnetic field along the loop is the enclosed current times the permeability constant.or was this law arrived by empirical and not theoretical means.

I do not know but I do not know if Ampers law is valid for short conductors passing through a loop. I did integrate and my integral was different from the expected I*U. The law seems to be valid only when long conductors pass through a loop but not short ones. Can anyone explain what am missing?

kk now even the tension on the hockey puck which you just mentioned did not do any work hence it cannot even be called a conservative force, because it did not even do any work at any moment during the reaction(i mean during the experiment). Now well, most times tensions are not conservative...

"The key then is to try to pick a reference frame with the least torques involved." so what ur saying is that indeed I did not make a mistake and the momentum is not conserved in all inertial reference reference frame. But I thought the laws of physics were meant to be the same in all inertial...

So I calculate the momentum of a body moving with a constant speed along a circular path with mass m, tangential velocity v and radius r. Its angular momentum is mvr.kk. Good. Now what if I calculate the angular momentum from a point on the path of the circle. A simple calculation shows that the...

same question to you: Now you guys have added a different dimension to the answer. So what would happen then. Is the velocity of the particle going to remain the same through out the time in this time varying magnetic field. If it remains the same then does it mean that the change in angular...

Now you guys have added a different dimension to the answer. So what would happen then. Is the velocity of the particle going to remain the same through out the time in this time varying magnetic field. If it remains the same then does it mean that the change in angular momentum is conserved by...

So that means that the change in momentum is not as a result of the magnetic force but as a result of the electric force that results from time varying magnetic field? right?

Ok they say a magnetic force can never do work on an object.ok but can anyone explain this to me? a particle is set in a velocity in the x direction, magnetic field in the y direction so dat the resultant magnetic force be in the z direction at this instant. Hence the particle moves in a circle...

u don't need to be dat rude after all i have asked dsame question and i have always got a beta ansa from mathiniese dan from either u or fredrick

hello.i must really 10k u 4 ur other explanations of Special Relativity to me. I appreciate ur patience a lot. Well there is still one aspect left 2 understand and dats the issue of mas increase. pls culd u do dat for me.10ks a million

pLEASE PARDON MY NAIVETÉ BUT I AM JUST A FRESHMAN

Please can you give me a very elementary prove for relativistic mass increase.thank you