Ampere's Law in Classical Electrodynamics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the applicability of Ampere's Law in classical electrodynamics, particularly in relation to short conductors passing through a loop. Participants explore the theoretical foundations and practical implications of the law, including its limitations and the role of displacement current.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of Ampere's Law for short conductors, noting discrepancies in their integral compared to expected results.
  • Another participant asserts that while Ampere's Law is always valid, its application becomes complex in the presence of edge effects.
  • A participant inquires whether the integral of the magnetic field along the loop is universally equal to the enclosed current times the permeability constant, regardless of conductor dimensions, and questions the empirical versus theoretical origins of the law.
  • It is suggested that modifications to Ampere's Law, such as including displacement current, are necessary, and that the law is theoretically verified as part of Maxwell's equations, though experimental verification is also emphasized.
  • A participant raises a question about the applicability of displacement current for short conductors under steady current conditions.
  • Another participant explains the necessity of a current loop for proper application of the law, indicating that for short conductors, the circuit must be closed to maintain current flow.
  • A later reply reflects on the relationship between electron drift, electric field intensity changes, and Maxwell's Law, seeking confirmation or correction of their understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of Ampere's Law to short conductors, with some asserting its universal validity while others highlight limitations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific conditions under which the law applies.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential limitations related to the assumptions of conductor length and the necessity of closing the circuit for short conductors, as well as the dependence on edge effects and the role of displacement current.

CHUKKY
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I do not know but I do not know if Ampers law is valid for short conductors passing through a loop. I did integrate and my integral was different from the expected I*U. The law seems to be valid only when long conductors pass through a loop but not short ones. Can anyone explain what am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ampere's law requires very strong symmetries to use properly. It's always valid, but the integral is very hard if edge effects are present.
 
but is their a way to show that no matter the dimension of the conductor passing through the loop the integral of the magnetic field along the loop is the enclosed current times the permeability constant.or was this law arrived by empirical and not theoretical means.
 
Well, you need to modify Ampere's law a little bit to include the so-called "displacement current". It is "verified" theoretically because it is one of Maxwell's equations. But of course, all physical laws must be verified experimentally.
 
but wld displacement current avail for short conductor?nd it was a steady current.
 
You need a current loop. The only reason you can neglect the "loop" part for the long wire is that you can say the other parts of the wire are far away. If you have a short conductor, you need to close the circuit to have current.
 
Awesome i just taught about that. kk And so what you saying is that due to the fact that electrons need to drift along the curved path, electric field intensity changes and Maxwell's law then avail right?if I am right reply me. And thank you very much for resolving this issue if my post is right. If my post aint right please correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K