'Would T. Essel provide a rigorous proof that Einstein\'s General Relativity requires of necessity that a singularity must only occur where the Riemann tensor scalar curvature invariant is unbounded. No relativist in the history of the subject has ever proved this tacit assumption, upon which...
to pervect
I am disappointed that none of you will address the straightforward proofs I have called for. Referring to the textbook arguments is futile. Why will you not attempt the proofs? It only requires schoolboy level matehmatics to demonstrate that Hilbert's solution (the black hole...
to pervect
I repeat here some of my comments in reply to Wallace, as they are relevant.
I ask yet again that some one or more of you prove the so far unproved basic assumptions that lead to the black hole. Prove that the arbitrary manipulation of Schwarzschild's true solution (which is...
to Wallace
You have clearly not understood my analysis. I have never claimed that the geometry varies with different admissible analytic functions of r in place of r. Please point to any statement in my work which makes this alleged claim, either explicitly or implicitly, to substantiate your...
You have not yet addressed the issues I asked you too.
Schwarzschild is regular on 0 < r < oo. To force a black hole from Schwarzschild's solution requires his r to go down to -alpha, contrary to the very definition of r leading to Schwarzschild's eq. 6, namely 0 < r < oo. Alternatively, to...
Here are extracts from my previous posts.
"I refer again to Schwarzschild's paper. I note that the issues I raised with respect to this have not been addressed. One cannot make the arbitrary moves on his variables from which the black hole has been conjured. Examine his equation (14), his...
Dear Pervect,
I appreciate your willingness to discuss the scientific issues concerning this topic. This is a rare attitude.
However, before I can address the Kruskal-Szekeres alleged coordinates, it is necessary that the questions I put to the forum be first answered, as they are...
I refer again to Schwarzschild's paper. I note that the issues I raised with respect to this have not been addressed. One cannot make the arbitrary moves on his variables from which the black hole has been conjured. Examine his equation (14), his arguments to his eq. (6) and note the points I...
The black holers' standard response is stoney silence. Other than that it is irrational abuse, for reasons not divulged. A favourite response in abuse is that the messenger is a "crackpot", even though the messenger is merely pointing to the verifible facts. But "crackpot" is not scientific...
It is also interesting to note that the black holers routinely make claims for black hole binaries, black hole mergers and black hole collisions. One need only peruse any textbook on General Relativity and the relentless postings to arXiv to verify this.
Now I remark that the black hole is...
The Moon could not become a black hole, hollow or otherwise, for the simple reason that black holes do not exist. Schwarzschild's solution precludes them, as can be verified by reading Schwarzschild (who NEVER breathed a single word about such an object) at...
Your objections are incorrect. Satisfaction of the field equations is a necessary but insufficient condition for a proposed solution for Einstein's gravitational field. There exists an infinite number of solutions to the field equations that are not solutions for the gravitational field.
The...
On black hole binaries and other fancies
The scientists now routinely make the claims that black hole binary systems, black hole collisions and black hole mergers not only occur in Nature, but will also provide sources of gravitational radiation, detectable by the LIGO and LISA projects...
I draw the forum’s attention to the fact that the so-called Schwarzschild solution is not Schwarzschild’s solution. This can be easily verified by reading Schwarzschild’s original paper. Furthermore, the all too frequent claim that Schwarzschild obtained the black hole from his solution is...