Dale's latest activity
-
Dale replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Agreed. I like these sorts of definitions because they directly address real risks without getting bogged down in these “fuzzy”... -
Dale replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.The paper that @PeroK provided gave a decent definition of "deception" for their paper. It is: "We define deception as the systematic... -
Dale replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Indeed, yes. A lot of the things that I think need regulation are actually just standard engineering ethics for safety-critical devices... -
Dale reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Informative.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266638992400103X -
Dale replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.I am concerned about regulations. Regulations are legally binding on the companies that wish to produce products covered by the... -
Dale replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.I completely agree that a trained deep neural network is more than the sum of its parts. I don’t see those as being mutually exclusive... -
Dale replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.In my opinion, this is a red herring. An AI is an engineered product. We do not accept harms from engineered products simply because... -
Dale replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.I agree, that is a different problem. Interesting. I think that would be something that could be measured in students. A big problem is...