danieltanfh95's latest activity
-
danieltanfh95 reacted to Planobilly's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Like.
Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? I will respond to the original question based on my experience with AI. First, I am not a... -
danieltanfh95 replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.I do worry about the future of humanity when we talk as if humanity itself cannot improve or progress in a similar pace. Humans are...
-
danieltanfh95 replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Mind me for the use of words, AI is dangerous is the exact words used by the EA folk. And those risks are already being worked on by...
-
danieltanfh95 reacted to AlexB23's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
AI is pretty good nowadays at doing math, but we as a society would need a few more years to determine if it can do original scientific...
-
danieltanfh95 replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Oh I definitely used a search engine, since otherwise I would have to scour the libraries to find what is, to me, common sense, if...
-
danieltanfh95 replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.This is not a conspiracy theory, and it is directly being discussed by the present US government, in bad faith, like a claim that Kimi...
-
danieltanfh95 replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.I find it somewhat endearing that you are accusing me of just copy pasting AI when we are in a claude-designed website. The...
-
danieltanfh95 replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.1. Your so called leading experts on the field are? What interests do they serve? Why is wider Asia (including Russia, Japan, Korea...
-
danieltanfh95 reacted to Roberto Pavani's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Haha.
Perhaps the discussion would benefit from a stronger focus on proposed tests rather than on definitions. A first, admittedly naive... -
danieltanfh95 reacted to Roberto Pavani's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Haha.
An interesting test would be to get this thread and provide it to a large AI and look the answer...
-
danieltanfh95 replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.While it is beyond my ability to suggest how to moderate the thread, I do note that we seem to afford a much wider range of speculation...
-
danieltanfh95 replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Be as it may that it seems we have a whole lot of personal theories on the risk or capabilities of AI thrown around here, let me try...
-
danieltanfh95 replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.I have already presented (obvious as it may be) the case that AI cannot replace humans, and humans remain crucial for any leap in...
-
danieltanfh95 replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Perhaps it is similarly vacuous to say, as well, that this technology or situation is what would end us. I would rather proceeding...
-
danieltanfh95 replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.I am really not sure why you think this is "not plausible". I myself grew up in a time where my parents thought the internet or the...