Demystifier's latest activity

Except that, at some moment of time, you have to assume that one photon has been destroyed. How would you describe photon destruction...

No. In BM the preferred foliation is preferred for all particles in the whole universe.

You mean - disagree?

Yes, but the outcome is a property of the measuring apparatus, not a property of the measured particle.

That's not quite true. In quantum optics, for example, it's quite common to treat photons in an essentially non-relativistic way. See...

Of course.

I see nothing odd with that, once I accept determinism. And this is not superdeterminism, because superdeterminism involves also a fine...

Once the A has been destroyed, for which you need QFT, there is no longer pilot wave connecting A and B. But note that "configuration...

No they don't. Once you get rid of this misconception, perhaps your other confusions will go away too. Just because the results of...

To describe the situation in which A no longer exists you need particle destruction, and for that you need QFT. Thus the usual Bohmian...

For details about spin in Bohmian mechanics I recommend https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.1280 For a relativistic version of Bohmian mechanics...

Do you mean repeating the measurement on a freshly prepared ensemble, or on the same ensemble after the first measurement? The answer is...

I think it is somewhere in between. Not anyone can understand it, but a whole lot of people do. It does take effort.

Yes.

Somewhat philosophically, I am impressed by the power of the diagonal argument in logic. The paradox in the first post by W was...