Recent content by DSamsom
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
I am not sure which document you're referring to but MegaBecquerels (10E6) can't be correct. Radioactivity in the air has been in the order of MicroBecquerels (10E-6) all the time- DSamsom
- Post #10,388
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
looking at the pictures of the decontamination system, i wonder how they are going to deal with the huge buildup of radioactivity in the filtersystems. Have they figured out a way to get rid of the radiating sludge fully automatically?- DSamsom
- Post #9,946
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
Temperatures in RPV reactor 3 are on the rise again after they lowered the rate of cooling water. That decission was most likely taken to limit the amount of radioactive waste water (problems with full tanks and/or leaking tank). Wonder whether they can afford to pump more water in the reactor...- DSamsom
- Post #8,477
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
Radioactive release into the ocean increases again. Probably due to the difficulties of dealing with the amount of radioactive water. And this was before the heavy rain: http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/30_01.html- DSamsom
- Post #8,450
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
Interesting figures. The 500 mSv however could be misleading. The title of the map is "organ dose of I-131". Assuming they mean the organ thyroid gland, which has a weighting-factor of 0,05, the resulting effective dose would be 25 mSv.- DSamsom
- Post #7,957
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
Tepco released a computer simulation showing dispersal routes and densities of radioactivity released form Fukushima NPP. http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/21_22.html Interesting: is this simulation available somewhere (other than the screenshots in this NHK item)?- DSamsom
- Post #7,916
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
Tepco does not trust the other water levels either. Will try to check on reactor 2 and 3. http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/16_04.html- DSamsom
- Post #7,345
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
Hm, this array of screenshots from apparently (can't verify) a few hours ago doesn't look very 'normal' or am I mistaken http://twitpic.com/4unrpd- DSamsom
- Post #6,084
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
And it seems the smoke from reactor 3 is black (and thick). Look at this short excerpt from the live feed. http://goo.gl/JBdwI- DSamsom
- Post #6,082
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
Would be too coincidental for the hourly webcam to register an explosion of some kind. And the no-wind (see ocean) situation is probably a better explanation for this odd shaped plume. Still, what is happening on the most recent webcampicture ? http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/f1-np/camera/index-j.html- DSamsom
- Post #5,564
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
Mm, something's going wrong there. See webcam image 28/4 08:00 AM (Japan Time) http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/f1-np/camera/index-j.html- DSamsom
- Post #5,167
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
Thanks for this. What's the link to this webcam?- DSamsom
- Post #4,881
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
This morning NHK reported problems in temperature of SFP unit 4. http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/25_12.html This might be an awkward dilemma for the oprerators since spraying water in large amounts was considered a risk for the damaged structure of the pool. Now spraying too little...- DSamsom
- Post #4,871
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
Apparantly NISA announced that the reactor builing No 4 is now flooded in 5 meters of water. Anyone to explain this? Do they mean the SFP?- DSamsom
- Post #4,048
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
D
Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi
From IAEA's daily briefing: "On 5th April, measurements were made at 7 locations at distances of 16 to 41 km, South and South West to the Fukushima nuclear power plant. The dose rates ranged from 0.3 to 31 microsievert per hour. At the same locations, results of beta-gamma contamination...- DSamsom
- Post #2,952
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering