Recent content by E=mc4

I get that. The point of the graviton and gravity waves is that it would radiate and in order to do so it has to have a speed. All agree on the speed of light. The black hole shows this cannot be.

I am not arguing against or in favor of a graviton. What I am inquiring about is what others are thinking {information I read in some other places}. The only way gravity could emanate from the event horizon is if {in the case a graviton existed} it had an escape velocity higher than the...

So explain then. Lower yourself to my ignorance oh mighty one.

The MWI main hypothesis is that the wave function does not collapse, but that all the probabilities within the function come into being because they were measured. Until the moment of measurement they were only, mathematical probabilities. So while in the Copenhagen Interpretation of QM the...

I am sorry, but are you saying that the speed of light limit does not apply to virtual particles?

They would be forced to admit that the observer causes the wave function to collapse. The other alternative under the "many worlds" hypothesis is that the observer creates infinite universes and realities. Both have at the center the "observer". The "many worlds" by trying to deny the...

This means that either the graviton does not exist and gravity is just spacetime curvature {what are the implications under QM?} or that the graviton does exist but it must travel at a speed faster than light {what are the implications under relativity?}. If the graviton existed, it has to...

How can we know anything about black holes if nothing, not even information can escape the event horizon? If we can know the mass and gravity of a black hole it is because some information is being sent by the black hole, but how can this be possible if nothing, not even light, can escape...

According to John von Neumann’s interpretation of QM, consciousness is why the wave function collapses. Copenhagen is on the same general idea, but does not mention it that categorically. Multiverse interpretation of QM says there is no wave function collapse, therefore the observer or...

Tell that to the string theory.

How would you know that?

QED explains interactions, not photons. I guess you subscribe to the idea of; "shut up and calculate." Or "light is light", or "gravity is gravity." Keep on calculating, have fun.

Makes you wonder what light really is.

Thanks.

If the Higgs gives mass, wouldn't the Higgs give gravity too? If it exists that is.