According to John von Neumann’s interpretation of QM, consciousness is why the wave function collapses. Copenhagen is on the same general idea, but does not mention it that categorically.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Multiverse interpretation of QM says there is no wave function collapse, therefore the observer or consciousness has no role in it. All probabilities of a particle exist in other alternative universes. So we come to the following scenarios.

Either all the other alternative universes exist already. This would make sense in Einstein’s universe were all spacetime is a continuum and therefore all is already determined from the beginning (no real choices); or

The observer by observing a possibility of a particle, chooses an alternative universe, many other alternative universes split from this original act. In this scenario, the observer plays a bigger role than in the Copenhagen or John von Neumann interpretation.

In this interpretation the observer does not collapse a wave function, it creates alternative universes.

Which is more crazy?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Multiverse vs Copenhagen, John von Neumann

Loading...

Similar Threads - Multiverse Copenhagen John | Date |
---|---|

Insights The Fundamental Difference in Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics - Comments | Jan 9, 2018 |

B Multiverse question | Oct 20, 2017 |

I Countable or Uncountable Cardinality of Multiverse? | Oct 8, 2017 |

What are the probabilities of multiverses? | Jun 18, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**