Recent content by Eqblaauw

  1. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    Dear mwi-forum participants, the poll is closed, I've deleted my account, and there by any direct evidence of the poll, though everything I mentioned can be verified by the people mentioned, if you want to use this poll for wikipedia or other sources you're free to do that, I will vouch for that...
  2. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    poll update, (sorry to copy the earlier message with changes, but I somehow couldn't edit it) I asked the following question to eminent physics , none of which I knew their ideas in advance: a: I subscribe to the MWI that contains many parallel universes that differentiate during every 'quantum...
  3. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    Tegmark says all consistent mathematically correct universes exist to know if this has any meaning you can ask yourself the question: consistent with what? -with itself that really hasn't got any meaning at all, if it hasn't got any observation to verify it, when there are observations, then you...
  4. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    Einstein has (in my eyes) a wonderful quote: I don't believe in math, As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality It doesn't in itself reject the mwi but I think it's a good medicine against some of the...
  5. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    poll update, I asked the following question to eminent physics , none of which I knew their ideas in advance: a: I subscribe to the MWI that contains many parallel universes that differentiate during every 'quantum event' (meaning that there are many perhaps an infinite number of copies of...
  6. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    ok, if you don't like the authority argument and think you have a genius mind that's above all that, (you're the Newton, and the rest is the church) than this message means nothing, that being said, I currently conduct a poll, I've mailed over 70 prominent physicists all having quantum mechanics...
  7. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    ok sorry for being pushy, but I think it's a relevant question, though purely psychology since when you believe a theory, it's interesting how much it affects your life, and since we're human, it's interesting to know the human consequences of a theory
  8. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    why don't you answer the question hurkyl? Maybe you don't explain why, maybe you do explain why, I'm curious
  9. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    a serious question to people who believe in mwi, do you feel less sad when a beloved one dies in an unlikely quantum chance event, for then he will live on in many worlds, then in a death less chance related?
  10. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    I do know that of the few prominent dutch scientists I have contacted (Ewine van Dishoeck, Vincent Icke, Leo Kouwenhoven and Gerard t Hooft), none of them subscribe to the MWI. (And I didn't knew that in advence). I also know that David Deutsch explicitly mailed to me he doesn't believe in the...
  11. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    I just received a mail from Gerard 't Hooft, he says he thinks MWI is absolutely false: There is one World. QT gives us many-worlds, only because it's not capable of choosing one right world. Tough there is one world. He also says he would have expected another outcome of the David Raub poll...
  12. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    your quote under your posts says it all
  13. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    I agree with the last sentence completely (so your not arguing against me here). I've read quite a lot of Freud, and his arguments aren't that compelling either. And what I say is basically what Karl Popper says (I've just found this): I found that those of my friends who were admirers of...
  14. E

    Problems with Many Worlds Interpretation

    Ken G, because of the faults in the post I posted this: I will quote it again for you, with some modifications (the post was a little bit unclear): when you have an explanation that explains everything if it would be true, it doesn't there by mean you have the right explanation. It just...
Back
Top