FactChecker's latest activity
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.By that criteria, a blind paraplegic would have zero intelligence. If a computer system contains more in its memory than any human can... -
FactChecker reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Like.
Even so, it did work out everything that humans have ever worked out about chess and more. To say that exhibits no intelligence... -
FactChecker reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
For example, AlphaZero was given the rules of chess, but not any advice on how to play. It taught itself to play way better than any...
-
FactChecker reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
Computer systems, as has been mentioned many times on this forum, are already doing that. That is precisely what machine learning is...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.What about doing a logic task that the vast majority of humans can't do no matter how much time you give them. Or a task that no human...
-
FactChecker reacted to bob012345's post in the thread Geometric Game: Fun With Matches (Safe!) with Like.
I think the author knew his target audience and generally what they would assume from his setup of the puzzle. And it takes some skill...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Geometric Game: Fun With Matches (Safe!).I think the difference is whether the phrase "exactly three equilateral triangles" is taken alone versus in the context of the puzzle...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Geometric Game: Fun With Matches (Safe!).IMO, it is ambiguous. I wouldn't interpret it that way. I would interpret it as "exactly three" rather than 2 or 4, etc. and there could...
-
FactChecker reacted to DaveC426913's post in the thread Geometric Game: Fun With Matches (Safe!) with Like.
Cunningham's Law. :wink:
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Geometric Game: Fun With Matches (Safe!).This reminds me of the saying that the fastest way to get an answer to a question on the internet is to post an intentionally incorrect...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.There certainly are computer algorithms that exceed human intelligence in part-tasks. Human chess moves are currently evaluated by...
-
FactChecker reacted to phyzguy's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
I'm always confused by the argument that says, "they are just machines, they can't be intelligent/conscious." Your brain is a...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Engineering Why an Extra Coin Gives Bob a 50% Chance?.Ouch! Sorry, I missed that. Maybe my posts and other's responses should be deleted.
-
FactChecker reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Engineering Why an Extra Coin Gives Bob a 50% Chance? with Like.
I'm not sure whether you've posted an attempt or just some initial calculations. You need to be clever. Here's a big hint. If they...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Engineering Why an Extra Coin Gives Bob a 50% Chance?.Very good! I didn't clarify it because I couldn't see a clear proof. You did it. Thanks!