FactChecker's latest activity
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Some AI programs can look at data and examples to draw conclusions and tendencies, then store them for later use. Some can do that... -
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.When you say that AI has no intelligence, you have to address my examples, not bring up your own. I would not categorize a light switch...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.A mediocre programmer can write AI programs that can solve problems which the programmer can't. Some AI programs can look at data and...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.It's similar with AI programs. You can load in a lot of smarts. Once that is done, you can ask it questions (A terminal is a "sensor". I...
-
FactChecker reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Like.
Out of interest, to what level do you play chess? -
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Ok. That sounds reasonable. 1) Why demand "all existing problems"? Would you demand that of a human? Can't it be intelligent about...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.I didn't say "at birth" Comparing that to some of today's AI systems is like comparing a first-grade student to Einstein. I don't think...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.By that criteria, a blind paraplegic would have zero intelligence. If a computer system contains more in its memory than any human can...
-
FactChecker reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
Even so, it did work out everything that humans have ever worked out about chess and more. To say that exhibits no intelligence...
-
FactChecker reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
For example, AlphaZero was given the rules of chess, but not any advice on how to play. It taught itself to play way better than any...
-
FactChecker reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
Computer systems, as has been mentioned many times on this forum, are already doing that. That is precisely what machine learning is...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.What about doing a logic task that the vast majority of humans can't do no matter how much time you give them. Or a task that no human...
-
FactChecker reacted to bob012345's post in the thread Geometric Game: Fun With Matches (Safe!) with Like.
I think the author knew his target audience and generally what they would assume from his setup of the puzzle. And it takes some skill...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Geometric Game: Fun With Matches (Safe!).I think the difference is whether the phrase "exactly three equilateral triangles" is taken alone versus in the context of the puzzle...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Geometric Game: Fun With Matches (Safe!).IMO, it is ambiguous. I wouldn't interpret it that way. I would interpret it as "exactly three" rather than 2 or 4, etc. and there could...