FactChecker's latest activity
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Gmail AI summaries.I don't think you should count on this. It's often shocking how careless people/companies are on things that they are experts at. -
FactChecker reacted to PeroK's post in the thread High School Classic question regarding the nature of quantum tunneling with
Haha.
If you've lost your cat, don't blame Quantum Mechanics. -
FactChecker replied to the thread Undergrad Formalizing infinity sets.When you talk about a "infinite", are you talking about a distance/metric, or are you talking about the number of elements in the set A... -
FactChecker reacted to sysprog1's post in the thread Help me build my server with a laptop that has a broken screen with
Like.
That machine has VGA and HDMI ports, whereby to connect to an external monitor ##-## if the port isn't damaged, it should become active... -
FactChecker reacted to geordief's post in the thread High School Knowledge and information in the physical world with
Like.
I understand that the Uncertainty Principle is considered as embedded in Nature and is not to be considered as a simple limit on the... -
FactChecker reacted to DaveC426913's post in the thread Undergrad Please Explain (actually explain) The Monty Hall Problem with
Haha.
-
FactChecker reacted to DaveC426913's post in the thread Undergrad Please Explain (actually explain) The Monty Hall Problem with
Like.
Yes. By a landslide. And not just in an intuitive sense; most seemed to know it probabilistically. -
FactChecker replied to the thread Undergrad Please Explain (actually explain) The Monty Hall Problem.Hay!!! I take that personally. ..... well, ok. :cool: If that was the FB consensus, I am surprised and impressed. -
FactChecker reacted to DaveC426913's post in the thread Undergrad Please Explain (actually explain) The Monty Hall Problem with
Wow.
I just realized this didn't land the way I thought it would. (especially since it's too low-rez to actually read the comments) FBusers... -
FactChecker reacted to Dale's post in the thread Undergrad Please Explain (actually explain) The Monty Hall Problem with
Haha.
The probability of a Monty Hall thread being only 2 posts long is substantially less than 1/3. -
FactChecker replied to the thread High School The wisdom of betting on a losing gamble."Hedging your bets" is a legitimate technique to reduce the severity/variance/magnitude of alternative outcomes. -
FactChecker reacted to Dale's post in the thread Undergrad Please Explain (actually explain) The Monty Hall Problem with
Like.
It fits fine, but is not as compelling. For the player that has the car behind their door, Monty cannot spoil the game and that player... -
FactChecker replied to the thread Undergrad Please Explain (actually explain) The Monty Hall Problem.Suppose Monte makes his decision blindly and the game is declared invalid and restarted if he opens the prize door. Then, for valid... -
FactChecker replied to the thread Undergrad Please Explain (actually explain) The Monty Hall Problem.But there might be a detail missing here. If Monte opens a door blindly, and it happens to be a goat by luck, then 50% is, indeed... -
FactChecker reacted to Baluncore's post in the thread Undergrad Please Explain (actually explain) The Monty Hall Problem with
Like.
In a nutshell. There are three boxes, 0, 1, and 2. The player picks a random box. 0, 1, or 2. If you simulate the game, then the player...