Recent content by fbgiant

This is where i am confused again . T think Karl Popper brought this concept that science should be falsifiable, he was a philosopher of science not a scientist even. Which authority or organisation is responsible to state that science should be falsifiable ? Kindly explain a bit, i didn't...

---I am not sure in which section i should post this question , so if it is wrong section kindly move it to the proper section ---- I am really confused to draw a clear line between what is science and what is not . I know science has some characteristics which differentiates it from...

i can't understand. even if it is balanced, there should be a pd across the galvanometer.(kirchoff's voltage rule). the voltage in that closed loop should be zero...

When potentiometer is used to measure and compare emf of cells, how that balncing point is reached?... this is the circuit diagram what i mentioned.. in the description it is said that at that balancing point (current through that galvanometer shows zero), potential drop across AC is equal...