Fra's latest activity

It is! It is superior in many ways, in particular as it takes the physics of measurement seriously, that you can't like in classical...

By this view, why isn’t QM more understandable to you than classical physics? It’s clearly a better theory. All the things known about...

I didnt mean todo that, but yes we were. But I thought we were disussing possible "explanations" beyond the descriptions, ie how can we...

The fallacy here is that here you over-extrapolate the acutual domain of corroboration (human scale observation) to apply universally...

Empirically well motivated from alot of experiments yes. But understanding a deeper explanation for the specific empirical facts, and...

As an aside: There are analogous interpretational debates around special and general relativity. See e.g. substantivalist vs...

Elevating something to a postulate or axiom, means that within the theory, it is something you do not further need to explain. But a...

I agree with this hook. This was discussed in other threads. Barandes is making good contributions, but the picture he provides is...

Of course, we can explain time dilation, cleanly and logically from the postulates, since 1905. Few theories are as clear and clean as...

I think RUTA will love to hear this! But as I see it: It is a fact that there indeed exists no explanation yet (as a scientific...

This quotation comes out insightful even in the light of today. I read this so that his intuition was and still is valid - there must be...

In most similar discussions there is always a mess of different use of terms like local, causal, action etc. This looping part of the...

QBism, Copenhagen (Asher Peres's variety), Consistent Histories, the Oxford branch (no pun intended) of Everettianism, Relational...

Unless by "spooky action at a distance" one means "violations of the Bell inequalities".

Correc,t there is nothing wrong with Bells theorem. There is no local hidden variables in the way of Bell definitions. /Fredrik