Fra's latest activity

Empirically well motivated from alot of experiments yes. But understanding a deeper explanation for the specific empirical facts, and...

As an aside: There are analogous interpretational debates around special and general relativity. See e.g. substantivalist vs...

Elevating something to a postulate or axiom, means that within the theory, it is something you do not further need to explain. But a...

I agree with this hook. This was discussed in other threads. Barandes is making good contributions, but the picture he provides is...

Of course, we can explain time dilation, cleanly and logically from the postulates, since 1905. Few theories are as clear and clean as...

I think RUTA will love to hear this! But as I see it: It is a fact that there indeed exists no explanation yet (as a scientific...

This quotation comes out insightful even in the light of today. I read this so that his intuition was and still is valid - there must be...

In most similar discussions there is always a mess of different use of terms like local, causal, action etc. This looping part of the...

QBism, Copenhagen (Asher Peres's variety), Consistent Histories, the Oxford branch (no pun intended) of Everettianism, Relational...

Unless by "spooky action at a distance" one means "violations of the Bell inequalities".

Correc,t there is nothing wrong with Bells theorem. There is no local hidden variables in the way of Bell definitions. /Fredrik

Fair point! I should have written that it is a conceptual framework that "allows" for an explanation - witout one particle in som...

This is not an explanation but a description.

The OP apparently seeks at plausible conceptual understanding of how nature can possibly logically pull this off, rather than just...