Recent content by |Fred

As far as the opinion given in this board was concerned, the exact expertise was (if I recall corectly) " if there is water in the RCV then meltdown is unlikely ". The available data indicated there was some watter. I do believe that the given statement still stand

If they believe cooling it no longer achievable, I make sens to fast forward to options that were on hold because they interferes with cooling. Retrospectively it could look like 2 months wasted, and I'm sure the expert who believed the core melted to the bottom within the first few...

looking at this zoom on poor quality video, seem conclusive with the fact that the multiple event "orange explosion and "vertical" movement were closer in there time line that I initially suspected. I believe I see the birth of "mushroom" cloud sucking in the orange explosion. There is...

Nah this is a twist .. Tepco says something like we need to watch the wall because they may be unstable and they were likely reffering to the north wall and part of the souther eat wall etc because of the way the "blast" destroyed some of the structure. And just like Nancy, Mr fair wind...

I'm glad that he corrected a couple inaccuracy he made in the past (2km not 2 miles, etc). I think he is mistaken on the U4 leaning theory because he did not saw the latest picture.

The SFP plugs as quoted in the service floor paper are the removable wall making a "channel" from the core to the SPF.

correct me if I'm wrong might but they drilled a hole in Chernobyl to prevent a reaction corium / watter. Not just to have a look.

They are the same resampled... most image viewer or browser can do the same one the fly. Not quite the same as hi-res

thx MadderDoc, I don't have time to finish that now.. but I'm in the process of doing this [PLAIN]http://i.min.us/jlgANw.jpg grr.. i got one color wrong.. on the right picture "the reconstructed thing..

before you go check on youtube the US HAwk helicopter drone footage (part 3) I grabbed the bottom picture from that , the moving picture gives a better sens of the 3 dimensional aspect that support my twisting theory ps: I'm not sure [AB] is attached but the vector of the metal part linking...

The other day I had AK that gave me a 60+% chance to win then the flop came and those odds dropped to 35%. One could think that considering that there is two outcome "win" or "lose" he had a 50/50% and play without looking at his card. :)

I do not think that a rational approach is undermined by weak data. As I use to be told geometry is the art of thinking out of false drawing. The idea not to make the theory fit the data. Does the actual adjustment, makes more sens ? Explain a gray area in the formally postulated hypothesis...

I've overlay and added some labeled I do believe that we can see an original steel structure between A and B It is my perception the "arc" aka green path between A and B is not a deformed formely mention AB steel structure. But my main point of attention is in the bottom view , I've...

Here is the link http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/14641270 I welcome translation insight if it has been said it was there, I expect more today

aye you are right to make this point as I did not legend them ,none the less it is the closest representation at hand , and it give some good perspective on how big this area is