Recent content by Gaurang
-
Classical Electrodynamics: Ohanian vs. Wangsness
Now that I look at it, in his preface, Ohanian states that he used to teach the course of electrodynamics from Schwartz and has developed his book from lecture notes given using that book itself. As much as I am delighted by this coincidence I am also confused :) One more question, is Schwartz a...- Gaurang
- Post #23
- Forum: Science and Math Textbooks
-
Classical Electrodynamics: Ohanian vs. Wangsness
Isn't Griffiths also conventional in the sense that he also discusses relativity(electromagnetism in relativity) at the end in just a few pages? from the looks of it ohanian looked just like griffiths but introduces relativity before magnetism (proper relativity, with four vectors and tensors...- Gaurang
- Post #21
- Forum: Science and Math Textbooks
-
What Are the Benefits of Pursuing a Theoretical Physics Major?
Hi! I am Gaurang Agrawal, 2nd-year Undergrad. Right now I am planning to major in physics although I have an equal interest in maths. I am more interested in the theoretical side of things rather than computation and real-world applications, Not that I dislike them but i prefer one side more...- Gaurang
- Thread
- Replies: 1
- Forum: New Member Introductions
-
Classical Electrodynamics: Ohanian vs. Wangsness
I know it's late, but if you have tried Ohanian can you tell me about it? I am in the same predicament as you were a few years ago. Griffiths and Purcell seem too handwavy while others like Schwartz and Greiner don't look friendly for me. Also, there is the lure of relativity in Ohanian. so...- Gaurang
- Post #19
- Forum: Science and Math Textbooks