gentzen's latest activity

But Barandes didn't even clarify this much. And it can make sense not to clarify, because there could be spurious division events. I...

Thanks, now I see what you mean. And based on Barandes' answer (he doesn't want to make any "arbitrary" clarifications beyond what is...

I think the comparison with Everett is pertinent. In Everett's interpretation, if the wavefunction splits into two decoherent branches...

See this timestamp, where he distinguishes the dynamical conditional (transition) probabilities from the epistemic standalone probabilities.

At the timestamp, Barandes remarks on the distinction between standalone probabilities and transition probabilities, the latter of which...

I get your point, it does raise problems! Also in the normal paradigm, we shouldnt confuse them. But here we try to probe deeper I...

That is beside the point. After one has setup a model for a specific physical situation, the roles are fixed. Procrastinating over the...

What you are missing is that Barandes’ proposal is not just a different perspective, but incomplete in some very concrete ways. One can...

So you label the screen as agent, because it plays the role of observer in your modeling of the S-G experiment? I don‘t like this way of...

No, even so this is a point which came up in the discussions here (on PhysicsForums), the two main objections raised by David Albert...

From SEP on Many-Worlds (written by Vaidman):

By "local" here is meant "free of action-at-a-distance", which, if you unpack further based on what's said in section 9 of the paper...

Bell on Bell’s theorem: The changing face of nonlocality Harvey R Brown, Christopher G Timpson https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.03521 So here...

And some sometimes claim to be local, for example MWI. But this claim risks to make MWI "unambiguous", and hence no longer satisfying...

Are you sure you have the correct timestamp? It doesn't clarify the points where David Albert sees the incompleteness. But I could even...