GiorgioPastore's latest activity
-
GGiorgioPastore reacted to Herman Trivilino's post in the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology? with
Like.
It also invokes the notion that the action is the cause of the reaction, elevating the status of the action above that of the reaction... -
GGiorgioPastore replied to the thread I Trigonometry problem of interest.I think the simplest way to get the result is by using the triangle with sides 2, 11, and AB in the modified figure below. The length of...
-
GGiorgioPastore reacted to A.T.'s post in the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology? with
Like.
And those events have a temporal ordering where the cause precedes the effect, while the forces in Newton's 3rd are simultaneous. -
GGiorgioPastore replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.Opinions, like definitions, are not right or wrong. They can be useful or useless. From my experience in teaching Physics, I can say...
-
GGiorgioPastore replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.It is not a problem for me. It is a problem for people who translate "fictitious forces" as "illusion" without further explanation. The...
-
GGiorgioPastore reacted to haushofer's post in the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology? with
Like.
I think every teacher knows that words are really important in physics. Physics is also about interpretation, or "ontology", or... -
GGiorgioPastore replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.Using inertia in place of mass is another confusing thing for beginners. Moreover, historically, the term "vis inertiae" is different...
-
GGiorgioPastore replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.It doesn't matter to somebody, no problem. Other people, mostly those who are involved in teaching Physics, understand the difference.
-
GGiorgioPastore replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?."Interaction force" is clear. "Inertial force" for something appearing only in NON-inertial reference frames sounds like an oxymoron. My...
-
GGiorgioPastore replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.Unfortunately, quite often in Physics, words have a different meaning than in ordinary language. This is an additional problem for...
