Recent content by GMB

  1. G

    Graduate Rudin 1.21 Problem understanding proof of unique positive root to the

    I know this thread is quite old, but nevertheless I've been asking myself the same question as bhagwad for some days now. I don't even see the necessity of defining t. When showing the contradiction of assuming yn<x, Rudin does it directly after defining h. On the contrary, when looking for the...