Recent content by GPPaille

  1. G

    Undergrad Geometrical interpretation of dot product (trying to prove)

    1- Take an easier example, like the rectangular inclined parallelogram define by the two vectors \vec{A}=(a,0,0), \vec{B}=(0,b,c). Only two projections has non-null area. Defining h=\sqrt{b^2 + c^2}, we know that P = ah since it's rectangular. But P = ah = a\sqrt{b^2 + c^2} = \sqrt{(ab)^2...
  2. G

    Undergrad How to evaluate a Triple Integral

    You need to define (x,y,z) with (r,t,z'): x = \frac{r}{2}cos\theta y = \frac{r}{3}sin\theta z = z' \left| J \right| = \begin{vmatrix} \frac{1}{2}cos\theta & -\frac{r}{2}sin\theta & 0 \\ \frac{1}{3}sin\theta & \frac{r}{3}cos\theta & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{vmatrix} =...
  3. G

    Undergrad Geometrical interpretation of dot product (trying to prove)

    Sorry, I don't have any picture, but it's simple to draw it on paper. Just take the YZ-plane projection and draw the two vectors (a_y,a_z), (b_y,b_z). It's like when you look at it from the X axis. \overrightarrow{i} \times \overrightarrow{k} = - \overrightarrow{j} because it's the algebraic...
  4. G

    Graduate Find b from a=b^x mod x^2 given a,x,p,q

    (a)^{\frac{1}{x}}=(b^x)^{\frac{1}{x}} a^{\frac{1}{x}}=b
  5. G

    Undergrad How to evaluate a Triple Integral

    Yes you can do it. It's even simpler than what I said but it's exactly the same thing, except that it's in one single step. So you have your answer or your stuck there?
  6. G

    Determining if W is a Subspace of R3

    0 = 0 + 0 = (2x1 + y1 + 3z1) + (2x2 + y2 + 3z2) = 2(x1+x2) + (y1 + y2) + 3(z1 + z2) If you write x3=x1+x2, y3=y1+y2, z3=z1+z2, then it will become clear that this vector (x3,y3,z3) is also in W.
  7. G

    11 Days of Walking and Playing Badminton at My Friend's House

    The answer is correct but the solution is guesswork. The goal of this exercise is to be able to create a mathematical model for the problem. You have three kinds of day. 1- Walk, 2- Badminton, 3- Nothing. These are your three unknowns, there's also three equations in the question. It will be...
  8. G

    11 Days of Walking and Playing Badminton at My Friend's House

    You should try to create a system of linear equations. Define a variable for each "activity", and do the sum. If you do nothing in a morning, it doesn't say that you did nothing in the evening. Your answer is wrong.
  9. G

    Undergrad Geometrical interpretation of dot product (trying to prove)

    ok! So we need to do it in three steps: 1- Show that the area of a parallelogram in 2D is the determinant of a 2x2 matrix containing the two side vectors. 2- Show that the area of a parallelogram in 3D is the squared sum of his projection on the three axis planes. 3- Make the final link...
  10. G

    Undergrad Geometrical interpretation of dot product (trying to prove)

    Then I really don't see what you want to know. I proved by an algebraic property that |c|=|a||b|sin\theta and I did not suppose anything.
  11. G

    Undergrad Geometrical interpretation of dot product (trying to prove)

    Using Lagrange's identity identity, you get |a \times b|^2 = (a \cdot a)(b \cdot b) - (a \cdot b)(a \cdot b) Which is simply equal to |a \times b|^2 = |a|^2|b|^2 - |a|^2|b|^2cos^2(\theta) |a \times b|^2 = |a|^2|b|^2 (1 - cos^2(\theta)) |a \times b|^2 = |a|^2|b|^2 sin^2(\theta)
  12. G

    Proving or Disproving the Isometry Property with Orthonormal Basis in L(V)

    But you don't have to apply T twice to see that (1,0) do not preserves length. Write it in term of the basis vectors. And you will see that only one basis vector preserves its length.
  13. G

    Proving or Disproving the Isometry Property with Orthonormal Basis in L(V)

    \left\|(\sqrt{2},i)\right\| = (\sqrt{2},i) \cdot (\sqrt{2},i)^* = 3
  14. G

    Undergrad Geometrical interpretation of dot product (trying to prove)

    Here, p is a scalar, that comes magically from the projection. And if it don't use the dot product to compute p, then I don't see the link between the dot product and cos(theta).
  15. G

    Undergrad Geometrical interpretation of dot product (trying to prove)

    But the dot product is hidden in |p|, and the way we compute the projection using the dot product uses the fact that we know that it's equal to cos(theta)/|A||B|. Explicitly, it looks like this: 1- Hypothesis: A dot B = cos(theta)/|A||B| 2- Use it to define projection 3- Use projection...