Grinkle's latest activity
-
Grinkle replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Its difficult for me to avoid human-centric chauvinism when I consider the question of whether LLM's should be declared intelligent... -
Grinkle replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.The authors are careful here. A snip from page 5 of the pdf - "It is possible that the strategic behavior we document below is itself... -
Grinkle reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Agree.
I don't agree with your major hypothesis. I don't think intelligence is required to deceive in the sense the paper you referenced is... -
Grinkle reacted to jack action's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Like.
It sounds more simplistic than logic, especially without definitions of "intelligent" or "lie". To link a lie to intelligence, you must... -
Grinkle replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.I committed to you that if you expanded, I would respond, and I did. Beyond that, I will accept the below as your final word. I don't... -
Grinkle replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.No, my response to that is that there are machines that play the piano. I agree that human piano playing requires intelligence, even... -
Grinkle replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.This is going to have me chuckling for at least a couple days. 😂 -
Grinkle reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Agree.
It also does not require any "awareness" or "understanding" or "intention" to accomplish a given outcome, on the part of whatever is... -
Grinkle replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.I wasn't intentionally trying to distract. What I was considering or trying to consider when I wrote what you responded to were things...