Grinkle's latest activity
-
Grinkle reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Agree.
Of course that's unrealistic--but then we humans can't even predict what specific bugs will be in code we wrote ourselves, with no LLMs... -
I would challenge anyone to predict a specific hallucination given a trained deep neural network. I am not limiting it to LLM’s, but not...
-
A LLM is a formal system; we can use it to number things, We can make it work with the set of natural numbers. An interesting question...
-
Grinkle replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.This discussion on hallucinations connected a dot for me that I really should have connected long ago. I spent many years of my career...
-
Grinkle reacted to jack action's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Like.
Maybe not in literature, but the test was brought up in this thread as proof that AI is intelligent: I must admit I worry about the... -
Grinkle replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.No, it is not measuring intelligence. It was not intended to measure intelligence - this is the crux of why you are getting so much...
-
Grinkle reacted to DaveC426913's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
I think this is missing the forest for the trees. The Turing Test does not place conditions on the tester (except that they are human)...
-
Grinkle replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.I think I am not understanding you properly - the below is to help me understand better. Imo, yes. I speculate if one could ask Turing...
-
Grinkle replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.You are conflating detection with intelligence here, no? The Turing test can't be flawed in the manner you suggest because it is what...
-
I wanted it to acquire as much data as possible, and that was the easiest ethical way to do so. Ideally there would be a bank of "good"...
-
Grinkle replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.The more I consider @Dale 's approach, the more I like it. Stripping away all of the romance and drama around AI by simply talking...
-
Grinkle replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.@Dale You know this is something we could actually implement as a thread, right? A co-rdinating mentor could pick another mentor as...
-
I think that I will define what I mean by intelligence based on the Dale test. The tester asks one question at a time, one to a LLM and...
-
Grinkle replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Why this? Because you couldn't think of how to end the test and this is the default or did you have other ways to end the test in mind...
-
Grinkle reacted to DaveC426913's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
My concern there is that threat-assessment may be short-circuited by existing predispositions about intelligence. I'm sure there are a...